Sarojavva urf sarojamma mallappa uppar vs Subhasappa bharamappa uppar — 259/2025

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section Order7rule1and2R/wSection26. Status: Objection to I A. Next hearing: 03rd June 2026.

O.S. - Original Suit

CNR: KAHV310011082025

Objection to I A

Next Hearing

03rd June 2026

e-Filing Number

07-08-2025

Filing Number

259/2025

Filing Date

12-08-2025

Registration No

259/2025

Registration Date

12-08-2025

Court

CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, HANGAL

Judge

356-CIVIL JUDGE and JMFC

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section Order7rule1and2R/wSection26

Petitioner(s)

Sarojavva urf sarojamma mallappa uppar

Adv. H M Soratur

Respondent(s)

Subhasappa bharamappa uppar

Hearing History

Judge: 356-CIVIL JUDGE and JMFC

06-03-2026

Objection to I A

28-01-2026

Objection to I A

03-12-2025

Objection to I A

27-10-2025

Objection to I A

23-09-2025

W.S and Objection

Interim Orders

13-08-2025
Orders

Summary: In O.S. No. 259/2025, the Civil Judge at Hangal granted an ex-parte temporary injunction in favor of the plaintiff, restraining the defendants from creating or subletting any encumbrance over the suit property until the next hearing. The court found the plaintiff had established a prima facie case and that the balance of convenience favored granting the injunction. The case is adjourned to September 23, 2025, with suit summons to be issued to defendants upon payment of prescribed court fees. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: In O.S. No. 259/2025, the Civil Judge at Hangal granted an ex-parte temporary injunction in favor of the plaintiff, restraining the defendants from creating or subletting any encumbrance over the suit property until the next hearing. The court found the plaintiff had established a prima facie case and that the balance of convenience favored granting the injunction. The case is adjourned to September 23, 2025, with suit summons to be issued to defendants upon payment of prescribed court fees. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, HANGAL All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case