Sarojavva urf sarojamma mallappa uppar vs Subhasappa bharamappa uppar — 259/2025
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section Order7rule1and2R/wSection26. Status: Objection to I A. Next hearing: 03rd June 2026.
O.S. - Original Suit
CNR: KAHV310011082025
Next Hearing
03rd June 2026
e-Filing Number
07-08-2025
Filing Number
259/2025
Filing Date
12-08-2025
Registration No
259/2025
Registration Date
12-08-2025
Court
CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, HANGAL
Judge
356-CIVIL JUDGE and JMFC
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Sarojavva urf sarojamma mallappa uppar
Adv. H M Soratur
Respondent(s)
Subhasappa bharamappa uppar
Hearing History
Judge: 356-CIVIL JUDGE and JMFC
Objection to I A
Objection to I A
Objection to I A
Objection to I A
W.S and Objection
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 06-03-2026 | Objection to I A |
| 28-01-2026 | Objection to I A |
| 03-12-2025 | Objection to I A |
| 27-10-2025 | Objection to I A |
| 23-09-2025 | W.S and Objection |
Interim Orders
Summary: In O.S. No. 259/2025, the Civil Judge at Hangal granted an ex-parte temporary injunction in favor of the plaintiff, restraining the defendants from creating or subletting any encumbrance over the suit property until the next hearing. The court found the plaintiff had established a prima facie case and that the balance of convenience favored granting the injunction. The case is adjourned to September 23, 2025, with suit summons to be issued to defendants upon payment of prescribed court fees. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: In O.S. No. 259/2025, the Civil Judge at Hangal granted an ex-parte temporary injunction in favor of the plaintiff, restraining the defendants from creating or subletting any encumbrance over the suit property until the next hearing. The court found the plaintiff had established a prima facie case and that the balance of convenience favored granting the injunction. The case is adjourned to September 23, 2025, with suit summons to be issued to defendants upon payment of prescribed court fees. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts