Rudrappa son of Basappa Devaigiri vs Gadigeppa son of Kalaveerappa Devagiri — 166/2015
Case under Under Order 7 Rule 1 2 and 3 R W Sec 26 of Cpc Section 26ofCPC. Status: Steps. Next hearing: 09th April 2026.
O.S. - Original Suit
CNR: KAHV310003052015
Next Hearing
09th April 2026
Filing Number
167/2015
Filing Date
27-04-2015
Registration No
166/2015
Registration Date
27-04-2015
Court
CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, HANGAL
Judge
356-CIVIL JUDGE and JMFC
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Rudrappa son of Basappa Devaigiri
Adv. S V Muradannanavar
Respondent(s)
Gadigeppa son of Kalaveerappa Devagiri
Hearing History
Judge: 356-CIVIL JUDGE and JMFC
Steps
Witness Summons
Witness Summons
ORDERS
For Reply
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 06-03-2026 | Steps |
| 07-02-2026 | Witness Summons |
| 16-12-2025 | Witness Summons |
| 13-11-2025 | ORDERS |
| 23-10-2025 | For Reply |
Interim Orders
Summary: The court allowed Interim Application (I.A.) No. XXI filed by plaintiff Rudrappa under Section 151 of the CPC, permitting handwriting expert Sri. Shankarappa Murala from Truth Lab, Bengaluru to testify via video conference regarding the disputed signature on the sale agreement (Ex. P4). The court exercised its inherent powers to do complete justice, noting the expert's ill-health and applying principles of natural justice to allow all possible opportunities for parties to establish their cases. Costs of Rs. 200 were imposed on the plaintiff. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The court allowed Interim Application (I.A.) No. XXI filed by plaintiff Rudrappa under Section 151 of the CPC, permitting handwriting expert Sri. Shankarappa Murala from Truth Lab, Bengaluru to testify via video conference regarding the disputed signature on the sale agreement (Ex. P4). The court exercised its inherent powers to do complete justice, noting the expert's ill-health and applying principles of natural justice to allow all possible opportunities for parties to establish their cases. Costs of Rs. 200 were imposed on the plaintiff. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts