Basavaraj S/o Heggappa Dharaneppanavar Urf Kadappanavar vs Guddappa S/o Neelappa Dharaneppanavar urf Kadappanavar — 75/2020

Case under Under Order 7 Rule 1 and 3 Cpc Section 713. Status: For Amended Plaint. Next hearing: 02nd June 2026.

For Amended Plaint Next hearing 02-Jun-2026 this date has passed

O.S. - Original Suit

CNR: KAHV310001932020

Filing Number

77/2020

Filing Date

28-May-2020

Registration No

75/2020

Registration Date

28-May-2020

Court

CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, HANGAL

Judge

356-CIVIL Judge and JMFC

Last updated 13-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

Under Order 7 Rule 1 and 3 Cpc Section 713

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Basavaraj S/o Heggappa Dharaneppanavar Urf Kadappanavar

    Adv. K C Pavali

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Guddappa S/o Neelappa Dharaneppanavar urf Kadappanavar

  2. 2.Chandrappa S/o Neelappa Dharaneppanavar urf Kadappanavar

  3. 3.Nagaraj Adoption son of Gangappa Dharaneppanavar

  4. 4.Chikkappa S/o Ningappa Nellibeeda(Legal Heir)

  5. 5.Santosh S/o Nagappa Bijapur

Case History

  1. 02-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 06-Mar-2026

    For Amended Plaint

    CIVIL Judge and JMFC

  3. 21-Jan-2026

    For Amended Plaint

    CIVIL Judge and JMFC

  4. 01-Dec-2025

    For Amendment and Amended Plaint

    CIVIL Judge and JMFC

  5. 17-Oct-2025

    Hearing On I A

    CIVIL Judge and JMFC

  6. 30-Aug-2025

    Notice

    CIVIL Judge and JMFC

  7. 12-Aug-2025

    objection

    CIVIL Judge and JMFC

  8. 07-Jul-2025

    objection

    CIVIL Judge and JMFC

  9. 18-Jun-2025

    objection

    CIVIL Judge and JMFC

  10. 21-Apr-2025

    Issues

    CIVIL Judge and JMFC

  11. 25-Feb-2025

    Summons

    CIVIL Judge and JMFC

  12. 30-Jan-2025

    Summons

    CIVIL Judge and JMFC

  13. 28-Jan-2025

    For Amendment and Amended Plaint

    CIVIL Judge and JMFC

  14. 16-Jan-2025

    For Amendment and Amended Plaint

    CIVIL Judge and JMFC

  15. 02-Dec-2024

    Await Notice

    CIVIL Judge and JMFC

  16. 28-Oct-2024

    Notice

    CIVIL Judge and JMFC

  17. 30-Sep-2024

    Hearing On I A

    CIVIL Judge and JMFC

  18. 27-Aug-2024

    Hearing On I A

    CIVIL Judge and JMFC

  19. 27-Jun-2024

    Notice

    CIVIL Judge and JMFC

  20. 31-May-2024

    Steps

    CIVIL Judge and JMFC

  21. 13-Mar-2024

    Steps

    CIVIL Judge and JMFC

  22. 21-Dec-2023

    Await Records

    CIVIL Judge and JMFC

  23. 02-Nov-2023

    Await Records

    CIVIL Judge and JMFC

  24. 30-Jun-2023

    Await Records

    CIVIL Judge and JMFC

  25. 29-Mar-2023

    Await Records

    CIVIL Judge and JMFC

  26. 17-Dec-2022

    Await Records

    CIVIL Judge and JMFC

  27. 01-Oct-2022

    Await Records

    CIVIL Judge and JMFC

  28. 04-Aug-2022

    Await Records

    CIVIL Judge and JMFC

  29. 24-May-2022

    Await Records

    CIVIL Judge and JMFC

  30. 24-Feb-2022

    Await Records

    CIVIL Judge and JMFC

  31. 12-Nov-2021

    Await Records

    CIVIL Judge and JMFC

  32. 15-Sep-2021

    Await Records

    CIVIL Judge and JMFC

  33. 30-Jun-2021

    Orders

    CIVIL Judge and JMFC

  34. 29-Mar-2021

    Orders

    CIVIL Judge and JMFC

  35. 01-Feb-2021

    Orders

    CIVIL Judge and JMFC

  36. 27-Nov-2020

    W.S and Objection

    CIVIL Judge and JMFC

  37. 13-Nov-2020

    OrdersView PDF

    Case Summary Case: OS.75/2020, Civil Judge and JMFC, Hangal Date: 13 November 2020 Outcome: The plaintiff's Interlocutory Application (I.A. No.1) for ad-interim temporary injunction to restrain execution of a compromise decree from OS No.148/2016 was dismissed. The court found the plaintiff failed to establish a prima facie case, as the defendant's possession of the disputed properties and the binding nature of the Lok-Adalat compromise decree were not sufficiently challenged with cogent evidence. No costs were awarded. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  38. 13-Nov-2020

    W.S and Objection

    CIVIL Judge and JMFC

  39. 12-Nov-2020

    W.S and Objection

    CIVIL Judge and JMFC

  40. 11-Nov-2020

    W.S and Objection

    CIVIL Judge and JMFC

  41. 07-Nov-2020

    W.S and Objection

    CIVIL Judge and JMFC

  42. 04-Nov-2020

    W.S and Objection

    CIVIL Judge and JMFC

  43. 23-Oct-2020

    W.S and Objection

    CIVIL Judge and JMFC

  44. 17-Oct-2020

    W.S and Objection

    CIVIL Judge and JMFC

  45. 28-Sep-2020

    Ws and Objection

    CIVIL Judge and JMFC

  46. 22-Sep-2020

    W.S and Objection

    CIVIL Judge and JMFC

  47. 21-Sep-2020

    W.S and Objection

    CIVIL Judge and JMFC

  48. 18-Sep-2020

    W.S and Objection

    CIVIL Judge and JMFC

  49. 16-Sep-2020

    Await Notice

    CIVIL Judge and JMFC

  50. 11-Sep-2020

    Await Notice

    CIVIL Judge and JMFC

  51. 05-Sep-2020

    Await Notice

    CIVIL Judge and JMFC

  52. 31-Aug-2020

    Hearing

    CIVIL Judge and JMFC

  53. 27-Aug-2020

    Hearing

    CIVIL Judge and JMFC

  54. 20-Aug-2020

    Await Notice

    CIVIL Judge and JMFC

  55. 12-Aug-2020

    Notice

    CIVIL Judge and JMFC

  56. 30-Jul-2020

    Hearing On I A

    CIVIL Judge and JMFC

  57. 28-Jul-2020

    Hearing On I A

    CIVIL Judge and JMFC

  58. 23-Jul-2020

    Hearing On I A

    CIVIL Judge and JMFC

  59. 20-Jul-2020

    Hearing On I A

    CIVIL Judge and JMFC

  60. 10-Jul-2020

    Hearing On I A

    CIVIL Judge and JMFC

  61. 29-Jun-2020

    Hearing On I A

    CIVIL Judge and JMFC

  62. 22-Jun-2020

    Hearing On I A

    CIVIL Judge and JMFC

  63. 15-Jun-2020

    Hearing On I A

    CIVIL Judge and JMFC

  64. 06-Jun-2020

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  65. 28-May-2020

    Case filed

    Registration No. 75/2020

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary Case: OS.75/2020, Civil Judge and JMFC, Hangal Date: 13 November 2020 Outcome: The plaintiff's Interlocutory Application (I.A. No.1) for ad-interim temporary injunction to restrain execution of a compromise decree from OS No.148/2016 was dismissed. The court found the plaintiff failed to establish a prima facie case, as the defendant's possession of the disputed properties and the binding nature of the Lok-Adalat compromise decree were not sufficiently challenged with cogent evidence. No costs were awarded. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case