MANJULA. B. vs SHANKARAVVA BASAVARAJ CHIKKANNANAVAR — 14/2022
Case under Order 7 Rule1 Cpc. Status: DEFEDENT EVIDENCE. Next hearing: 28th April 2026.
O.S. - Original Suit
CNR: KAHV310000382022
Next Hearing
28th April 2026
e-Filing Number
19-01-2022
Filing Number
14/2022
Filing Date
19-01-2022
Registration No
14/2022
Registration Date
19-01-2022
Court
CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, HANGAL
Judge
356-CIVIL JUDGE and JMFC
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
MANJULA. B.
Adv. S M ADUR
KAVYA. B.
KAVAN. B.
Respondent(s)
SHANKARAVVA BASAVARAJ CHIKKANNANAVAR
CHANNABASAPPA BASAVARAJ CHIKKANNANAVAR
SHANMUKAPPA BASAVARAJ CHIKKANNANAVAR
Hearing History
Judge: 356-CIVIL JUDGE and JMFC
DEFEDENT EVIDENCE
DEFEDENT EVIDENCE
DEFEDENT EVIDENCE
Plaintiff Evidence
Plaintiff Evidence
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 06-03-2026 | DEFEDENT EVIDENCE |
| 13-02-2026 | DEFEDENT EVIDENCE |
| 19-12-2025 | DEFEDENT EVIDENCE |
| 19-11-2025 | Plaintiff Evidence |
| 16-10-2025 | Plaintiff Evidence |
Interim Orders
Summary This is OS (Original Suit) No. 14/2022 from a Kannada civil court. The court examined witness testimony on 16-10-2025 regarding disputed property ownership. The court found that the disputed properties belong to the first defendant (based on ancestral inheritance records), not to the plaintiff or defendants 2 and 3. The court rejected the plaintiff's claims that the properties were recently acquired by a person named Basavraj Chikanna, determining they are ancestral/inherited assets of the first defendant's family. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary This is OS (Original Suit) No. 14/2022 from a Kannada civil court. The court examined witness testimony on 16-10-2025 regarding disputed property ownership. The court found that the disputed properties belong to the first defendant (based on ancestral inheritance records), not to the plaintiff or defendants 2 and 3. The court rejected the plaintiff's claims that the properties were recently acquired by a person named Basavraj Chikanna, determining they are ancestral/inherited assets of the first defendant's family. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts