Fakkiresh Shivappa Bhavimani vs Santosh V K — 1125/2024

Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 142(a)r/w138. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 10th April 2026.

Evidence Next hearing 10-Apr-2026 this date has passed

C.C. - CRIMINAL CASES

CNR: KAHV300023082024

Filing Number

1130/2024

Filing Date

26-Oct-2024

Registration No

1125/2024

Registration Date

26-Oct-2024

Court

SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, HANGAL

Judge

1196-I Addl Senior Civil Judge And JMFC Court Hangal

Last updated 13-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 142(a)r/w138

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Fakkiresh Shivappa Bhavimani

    Adv. K N Kurubar

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Santosh V K

Case History

  1. 10-Apr-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 06-Mar-2026

    Deposition

  3. 06-Mar-2026

    Evidence

    I Addl Senior Civil Judge And JMFC Court Hangal

  4. 20-Feb-2026

    Evidence

    I Addl Senior Civil Judge And JMFC Court Hangal

  5. 09-Jan-2026

    To hear

    I Addl Senior Civil Judge And JMFC Court Hangal

  6. 26-Dec-2025

    To hear

    I Addl Senior Civil Judge And JMFC Court Hangal

  7. 05-Dec-2025

    To hear

    I Addl Senior Civil Judge And JMFC Court Hangal

  8. 16-Oct-2025

    To hear

    I Addl Senior Civil Judge And JMFC Court Hangal

  9. 22-Aug-2025

    To hear

    I Addl Senior Civil Judge And JMFC Court Hangal

  10. 14-Jul-2025

    To hear

    I Addl Senior Civil Judge And JMFC Court Hangal

  11. 06-Jun-2025

    To hear

  12. 02-May-2025

    To hear

    I Addl Senior Civil Judge And JMFC Court Hangal

  13. 21-Apr-2025

    To hear

    I Addl Senior Civil Judge And JMFC Court Hangal

  14. 09-Apr-2025

    Objection

    I Addl Senior Civil Judge And JMFC Court Hangal

  15. 02-Apr-2025

    DepositionView PDF

    Summary This is a civil case (CC No. 1125/2024) heard on 02.04.2025 in Kannada involving a cheque dispute. The witness (PW-1) testified that the accused purchased items worth Rs. 2,000 in 2023 but issued a bounced cheque for Rs. 4,000. The court recorded the witness's detailed examination, documenting allegations regarding the cheque's authenticity and the accused's financial capacity, with cross-examination completed by the defense counsel. The case proceedings continue with evidence recording. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  16. 02-Apr-2025

    Evidence

    I Addl Senior Civil Judge And JMFC Court Hangal

  17. 22-Mar-2025

    DepositionView PDF

  18. 22-Mar-2025

    Evidence

    I Addl Senior Civil Judge And JMFC Court Hangal

  19. 19-Mar-2025

    Arguments

    I Addl Senior Civil Judge And JMFC Court Hangal

  20. 11-Mar-2025

    Evidence

    I Addl Senior Civil Judge And JMFC Court Hangal

  21. 05-Mar-2025

    Accussed Statement u/s 313 CrPC

    I Addl Senior Civil Judge And JMFC Court Hangal

  22. 27-Feb-2025

    Accussed Statement u/s 313 CrPC

    I Addl Senior Civil Judge And JMFC Court Hangal

  23. 19-Feb-2025

    Evidence

    I Addl Senior Civil Judge And JMFC Court Hangal

  24. 15-Feb-2025

    Evidence

    I Addl Senior Civil Judge And JMFC Court Hangal

  25. 06-Feb-2025

    Evidence

    I Addl Senior Civil Judge And JMFC Court Hangal

  26. 01-Feb-2025

    NBW To Accused

    I Addl Senior Civil Judge And JMFC Court Hangal

  27. 24-Dec-2024

    NBW To Accused

    I Addl Senior Civil Judge And JMFC Court Hangal

  28. 28-Nov-2024

    Summons

    I Addl Senior Civil Judge And JMFC Court Hangal

  29. 26-Oct-2024

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  30. 26-Oct-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. 1125/2024

casestatus.in Summary

Summary This is a civil case (CC No. 1125/2024) heard on 02.04.2025 in Kannada involving a cheque dispute. The witness (PW-1) testified that the accused purchased items worth Rs. 2,000 in 2023 but issued a bounced cheque for Rs. 4,000. The court recorded the witness's detailed examination, documenting allegations regarding the cheque's authenticity and the accused's financial capacity, with cross-examination completed by the defense counsel. The case proceedings continue with evidence recording. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case