Fakkiresh Shivappa Bhavimani vs Santosh V K — 1119/2024
Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 142(a)r/w138. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 10th April 2026.
C.C. - CRIMINAL CASES
CNR: KAHV300023022024
Filing Number
1124/2024
Filing Date
26-Oct-2024
Registration No
1119/2024
Registration Date
26-Oct-2024
Court
SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, HANGAL
Judge
1196-I Addl Senior Civil Judge And JMFC Court Hangal
Last updated 13-Mar-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Fakkiresh Shivappa Bhavimani
Adv. K N Kurubar
Respondent(s)
-
1.Santosh V K
Case History
-
10-Apr-2026
Next hearingPending
-
06-Mar-2026
Deposition
-
06-Mar-2026
Evidence
I Addl Senior Civil Judge And JMFC Court Hangal
-
20-Feb-2026
Evidence
I Addl Senior Civil Judge And JMFC Court Hangal
-
09-Jan-2026
To hear
I Addl Senior Civil Judge And JMFC Court Hangal
-
26-Dec-2025
To hear
I Addl Senior Civil Judge And JMFC Court Hangal
-
06-Dec-2025
To hear
I Addl Senior Civil Judge And JMFC Court Hangal
-
16-Oct-2025
To hear
I Addl Senior Civil Judge And JMFC Court Hangal
-
30-Aug-2025
To hear
I Addl Senior Civil Judge And JMFC Court Hangal
-
30-Jul-2025
To hear
I Addl Senior Civil Judge And JMFC Court Hangal
-
13-Jun-2025
To hear
-
02-May-2025
To hear
I Addl Senior Civil Judge And JMFC Court Hangal
-
21-Apr-2025
To hear
I Addl Senior Civil Judge And JMFC Court Hangal
-
09-Apr-2025
Objection
I Addl Senior Civil Judge And JMFC Court Hangal
-
02-Apr-2025
Deposition
-
02-Apr-2025
Evidence
I Addl Senior Civil Judge And JMFC Court Hangal
-
22-Mar-2025
DepositionView PDF
Case Summary Case No: CC No. 1119/2024 Court: Senior Civil Judge, Hanagal Date: 22.03.2025 Summary: This is a civil case involving disputed land transactions and monetary disputes between the parties. The witness (PW-1) testified on 22.03.2025 regarding allegations that the defendant (respondent) misappropriated agricultural land and obtained money through fraudulent means, including unauthorized checks and land transfers. The witness claimed the defendant received approximately ₹2-2.10 lakhs over 3-4 years and disputed the authenticity of checks issued by the defendant. The case involves examination of evidence regarding land ownership, monetary transactions, and alleged forgery of documents. The court heard the witness examination and the case appears to be in the evidentiary stage with cross-examination of the defendant's counsel pending. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
22-Mar-2025
Evidence
I Addl Senior Civil Judge And JMFC Court Hangal
-
19-Mar-2025
Arguments
I Addl Senior Civil Judge And JMFC Court Hangal
-
11-Mar-2025
Evidence
I Addl Senior Civil Judge And JMFC Court Hangal
-
05-Mar-2025
Accussed Statement u/s 313 CrPC
I Addl Senior Civil Judge And JMFC Court Hangal
-
27-Feb-2025
Accussed Statement u/s 313 CrPC
I Addl Senior Civil Judge And JMFC Court Hangal
-
19-Feb-2025
Evidence
I Addl Senior Civil Judge And JMFC Court Hangal
-
15-Feb-2025
Evidence
I Addl Senior Civil Judge And JMFC Court Hangal
-
06-Feb-2025
Evidence
I Addl Senior Civil Judge And JMFC Court Hangal
-
01-Feb-2025
Framing Of Charge Or Plea
I Addl Senior Civil Judge And JMFC Court Hangal
-
24-Dec-2024
NBW To Accused
I Addl Senior Civil Judge And JMFC Court Hangal
-
28-Nov-2024
Summons
I Addl Senior Civil Judge And JMFC Court Hangal
-
26-Oct-2024
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
26-Oct-2024
Case filed
Registration No. 1119/2024
Case Summary Case No: CC No. 1119/2024 Court: Senior Civil Judge, Hanagal Date: 22.03.2025 Summary: This is a civil case involving disputed land transactions and monetary disputes between the parties. The witness (PW-1) testified on 22.03.2025 regarding allegations that the defendant (respondent) misappropriated agricultural land and obtained money through fraudulent means, including unauthorized checks and land transfers. The witness claimed the defendant received approximately ₹2-2.10 lakhs over 3-4 years and disputed the authenticity of checks issued by the defendant. The case involves examination of evidence regarding land ownership, monetary transactions, and alleged forgery of documents. The court heard the witness examination and the case appears to be in the evidentiary stage with cross-examination of the defendant's counsel pending. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts