Manmitha M D/o. Late Mahesh A R by M/G Sundaramma W/o S A vs Saravesh Prakash Girap — 665/2025

Case under Under Sec.166 of M.v.act Section 166. Status: Arguments. Next hearing: 06th July 2026.

Arguments Next hearing 06-Jul-2026 this date has passed

M.V.C. - Accident Claim Cases u/r M.V.

CNR: KAHV300007132025

Filing Number

665/2025

Filing Date

26-Mar-2025

Registration No

665/2025

Registration Date

02-Apr-2025

Court

SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, HANGAL

Judge

573-Principal Senior Civil Judge and JMFC Hangal

Last updated 26-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Under Sec.166 of M.v.act Section 166

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Manmitha M D/o. Late Mahesh A R by M/G Sundaramma W/o S A

    Adv. TIPPANNA SAVANUR

  2. 2.Sahitya M D/o. Late Mahesh A R/by M G Petitioner No.3

  3. 3.Sundaramma W/o. Late Shankar Achari

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Saravesh Prakash Girap

  2. 2.The branch Officer Sri Ram General Insurance Company LTD

Case History

  1. 06-Jul-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 22-Jun-2026

    Arguments

    Principal Senior Civil Judge and JMFC Hangal

  3. 01-Jun-2026

    Evidence

    Principal Senior Civil Judge and JMFC Hangal

  4. 27-Apr-2026

    Evidence

    Principal Senior Civil Judge and JMFC Hangal

  5. 23-Mar-2026

    Deposition

    Summary of MVC Case No. 665/2025 Outcome: The petition was dismissed. The court found that the petitioners (daughters of deceased Mahesh A R) failed to produce documentary evidence establishing their relationship to the deceased or that they were dependents. The court also noted inconsistencies in witness testimonies regarding the accident circumstances and determined that the respondents could not be held liable without proper substantiation of the petitioners' claims. No compensation was awarded. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  6. 23-Mar-2026

    Evidence

    Principal Senior Civil Judge and JMFC Hangal

  7. 16-Mar-2026

    Evidence

    Principal Senior Civil Judge and JMFC Hangal

  8. 02-Mar-2026

    Deposition

  9. 02-Mar-2026

    Evidence

    Principal Senior Civil Judge and JMFC Hangal

  10. 09-Feb-2026

    Evidence

    Principal Senior Civil Judge and JMFC Hangal

  11. 12-Jan-2026

    Objection

    Principal Senior Civil Judge and JMFC Hangal

  12. 03-Nov-2025

    Objection

    Principal Senior Civil Judge and JMFC Hangal

  13. 06-Oct-2025

    Objection

    Principal Senior Civil Judge and JMFC Hangal

  14. 29-Sep-2025

    Objection

    Principal Senior Civil Judge and JMFC Hangal

  15. 01-Sep-2025

    Objection

    Principal Senior Civil Judge and JMFC Hangal

  16. 07-Jul-2025

    Objection

    Principal Senior Civil Judge and JMFC Hangal

  17. 30-Jun-2025

    Notice

    Principal Senior Civil Judge and JMFC Hangal

  18. 09-Jun-2025

    Notice

    Principal Senior Civil Judge and JMFC Hangal

  19. 12-May-2025

    Notice

    Principal Senior Civil Judge and JMFC Hangal

  20. 04-Apr-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  21. 26-Mar-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 665/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Summary of MVC Case No. 665/2025 Outcome: The petition was dismissed. The court found that the petitioners (daughters of deceased Mahesh A R) failed to produce documentary evidence establishing their relationship to the deceased or that they were dependents. The court also noted inconsistencies in witness testimonies regarding the accident circumstances and determined that the respondents could not be held liable without proper substantiation of the petitioners' claims. No compensation was awarded. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case