Peeramahamad Anvarsab Erekuppi vs The Registrar of Birth and Death, TMC Byadgi — 254/2025
Case under Registration of Births and Deaths Act Section 13(3). Disposed: Uncontested--DISPOSED OTHERWISE on 06th March 2026.
Crl.Misc. - CRIMINAL MISC.CASES
CNR: KAHV210019982025
Filing Number
254/2025
Filing Date
30-Dec-2025
Registration No
254/2025
Registration Date
30-Dec-2025
Court
CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, BYADGI
Judge
355-CIVIL Judge and JMFC
Decision Date
06-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--DISPOSED OTHERWISE
Last updated 13-Mar-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Peeramahamad Anvarsab Erekuppi
Adv. P.B.SINGI
-
2.Najima W/o Mabusab Belagav
Respondent(s)
-
1.The Registrar of Birth and Death, TMC Byadgi
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
06-Mar-2026
Orders
Summary The Civil Judge & JMFC, Byadgi allowed the petition filed under Section 13(3) of the Registration of Births and Deaths Act. The court directed the respondent (Birth and Death Registrar) to register the death of Sri. Anvarsab Karimsab Erekuppi, who died on 01.10.1971, and issue a death certificate. The court found that the petitioners had sufficiently proved the death through testimony and newspaper publications, while the respondent failed to file any objections, making the petitioners' unchallenged claim credible. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
06-Mar-2026
Disposed
CIVIL Judge and JMFC
-
26-Feb-2026
Deposition
-
26-Feb-2026
Orders
CIVIL Judge and JMFC
-
30-Dec-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
30-Dec-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 254/2025
Summary The Civil Judge & JMFC, Byadgi allowed the petition filed under Section 13(3) of the Registration of Births and Deaths Act. The court directed the respondent (Birth and Death Registrar) to register the death of Sri. Anvarsab Karimsab Erekuppi, who died on 01.10.1971, and issue a death certificate. The court found that the petitioners had sufficiently proved the death through testimony and newspaper publications, while the respondent failed to file any objections, making the petitioners' unchallenged claim credible. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts