Vijayalaxmi Gadigeppa Totager vs Channabasappa Basappa Totager — 191/2019
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section U/o7Rule1and2ofCPC. Status: Amendment. Next hearing: 17th March 2026.
O.S. - Original Suit
CNR: KAHV210007202019
Next Hearing
17th March 2026
Filing Number
191/2019
Filing Date
21-09-2019
Registration No
191/2019
Registration Date
21-09-2019
Court
CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, BYADGI
Judge
355-CIVIL JUDGE and JMFC
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Vijayalaxmi Gadigeppa Totager
Adv. S N BARKI
Kavyanjali Gadigeppa Totager her M/G Def. No. 1 Vijalaxmi Gadigeppa Totager
Respondent(s)
Channabasappa Basappa Totager
Kannappa Adiveppa Koppad
Roopa Gangadhar Muttagi
Deepa Mahantesh Belavadi
Hearing History
Judge: 355-CIVIL JUDGE and JMFC
Amendment
Amendment
Amendment
HEARING
Objection
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 06-03-2026 | Amendment |
| 26-02-2026 | Amendment |
| 20-02-2026 | Amendment |
| 07-01-2026 | HEARING |
| 01-12-2025 | Objection |
Interim Orders
Summary The Civil Judge at Byadgi allowed Interlocutory Application (IA) No. IV filed by proposed defendants No. 5 and 6, impleading them as necessary parties (defendants No. 5 and 6) in the partition suit. The court found them essential to effective adjudication since they claim inheritance rights via a Will deed over the disputed property. Plaintiffs are directed to amend their plaint accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The Civil Judge at Byadgi allowed Interlocutory Application (IA) No. IV filed by proposed defendants No. 5 and 6, impleading them as necessary parties (defendants No. 5 and 6) in the partition suit. The court found them essential to effective adjudication since they claim inheritance rights via a Will deed over the disputed property. Plaintiffs are directed to amend their plaint accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts