Sikandar Mahamadalisab Benchihalli vs Abdul Khadar S/o Meerasab Bhagavan — 16/2026

Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 02nd April 2026.

Evidence Next hearing 02-Apr-2026 this date has passed

C.C. - CRIMINAL CASES

CNR: KAHV210000602026

Filing Number

16/2026

Filing Date

14-Jan-2026

Registration No

16/2026

Registration Date

14-Jan-2026

Court

CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, BYADGI

Judge

355-CIVIL Judge and JMFC

Last updated 13-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Sikandar Mahamadalisab Benchihalli

    Adv. M A MULLA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Abdul Khadar S/o Meerasab Bhagavan

Case History

  1. 02-Apr-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 06-Mar-2026

    313 StatementView PDF

  3. 06-Mar-2026

    PleaView PDF

  4. 06-Mar-2026

    313 StatementView PDF

  5. 06-Mar-2026

    PleaView PDF

    Summary: A cheque bounce case under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act was filed before the JMFC, Byadagi. The accused, Sri. Mahammad Arif Abidina Khan, was charged with issuing a cheque for Rs. 3,00,000 dated 06.03.2025 that was returned with "Funds Insufficient" endorsement and was not honored despite notice. The court read and explained the substance of accusation to the accused on 06.03.2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  6. 06-Mar-2026

    Evidence

    CIVIL Judge and JMFC

  7. 14-Jan-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  8. 14-Jan-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 16/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: A cheque bounce case under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act was filed before the JMFC, Byadagi. The accused, Sri. Mahammad Arif Abidina Khan, was charged with issuing a cheque for Rs. 3,00,000 dated 06.03.2025 that was returned with "Funds Insufficient" endorsement and was not honored despite notice. The court read and explained the substance of accusation to the accused on 06.03.2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case