Sri Riyaz S/o Hajaratsab Desur vs Sri Abdul Khadar S/o Meerasab Bhagavan — 3/2026

Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138,BNSS-223. Status: EVIDENCE. Next hearing: 02nd April 2026.

C.C. - CRIMINAL CASES

CNR: KAHV210000182026

EVIDENCE

Next Hearing

02nd April 2026

Filing Number

3/2026

Filing Date

07-01-2026

Registration No

3/2026

Registration Date

07-01-2026

Court

CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, BYADGI

Judge

355-CIVIL JUDGE and JMFC

Acts & Sections

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138,BNSS-223

Petitioner(s)

Sri Riyaz S/o Hajaratsab Desur

Adv. M A MULLA

Respondent(s)

Sri Abdul Khadar S/o Meerasab Bhagavan

Hearing History

Judge: 355-CIVIL JUDGE and JMFC

06-03-2026

EVIDENCE

03-03-2026

BAIL

07-01-2026

Summons to Accused

Interim Orders

06-03-2026
313 Statement
06-03-2026
Plea

This is a complaint case (CC.No.03/2026) filed before the JMFC Court in Byadagi under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, where complainant Riyaz alleged that accused Abdul Khadar issued a cheque for Rs. 3,35,000 dated 05.11.2025 which was returned with "Funds Insufficient" and was not honored despite notice. The case record shows the accused was informed of the charges on 06.03.2026, with questions posed regarding his understanding of the accusation and whether he pleads guilty or claims to be tried; however, the document does not contain the accused's answers or the court's final order/direction. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

This is a complaint case (CC.No.03/2026) filed before the JMFC Court in Byadagi under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, where complainant Riyaz alleged that accused Abdul Khadar issued a cheque for Rs. 3,35,000 dated 05.11.2025 which was returned with "Funds Insufficient" and was not honored despite notice. The case record shows the accused was informed of the charges on 06.03.2026, with questions posed regarding his understanding of the accusation and whether he pleads guilty or claims to be tried; however, the document does not contain the accused's answers or the court's final order/direction. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, BYADGI All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case