Hanumanthappa Thirakappa Naykar alias Byadagi vs Ashok Ningappa alias Nilappa Kurubar Advocate - S N Barki — 1130/2019
Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 166. Status: ARGUMENTS. Next hearing: 25th March 2026.
M.V.C. - Accident Claim Cases u/r M.V.
CNR: KAHV200004702019
Next Hearing
25th March 2026
Filing Number
1130/2019
Filing Date
03-09-2019
Registration No
1130/2019
Registration Date
17-09-2019
Court
SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, BYADGI
Judge
1223-Senior Civil Judge and JMFC Byadgi
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Hanumanthappa Thirakappa Naykar alias Byadagi
Adv. K.S.Naikar.
Respondent(s)
Ashok Ningappa alias Nilappa Kurubar Advocate - S N Barki
The Divisional Manager United india Insurance Co Ltd
Adv. P C Shigihalli
Hearing History
Judge: 1223-Senior Civil Judge and JMFC Byadgi
ARGUMENTS
Reply
Reply
Reply
JUDGMENTS
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 06-03-2026 | ARGUMENTS |
| 25-02-2026 | Reply |
| 21-01-2026 | Reply |
| 20-12-2025 | Reply |
| 06-12-2025 | JUDGMENTS |
Interim Orders
Case Summary Case No.: MVC 1130/2019 | Court: Senior Civil Judge & JMMFC, Badagi Outcome: The court rejected the plaintiff's claims for compensation in this motor vehicle accident case. The judge found significant inconsistencies in the witness testimony and evidence, particularly regarding the accident's cause, injuries sustained, and medical treatment. The court ruled that the defendant insurance company is not liable for compensation, dismissing the petition. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary Case No.: MVC 1130/2019 | Court: Senior Civil Judge & JMMFC, Badagi Outcome: The court rejected the plaintiff's claims for compensation in this motor vehicle accident case. The judge found significant inconsistencies in the witness testimony and evidence, particularly regarding the accident's cause, injuries sustained, and medical treatment. The court ruled that the defendant insurance company is not liable for compensation, dismissing the petition. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts