State of Karnataka vs Ravikumar C Patted — 448/2018
Case under Code of Criminal Procedure Section IPC1860us406,420,467,468,471,34Act1955us3,7. Status: EVIDENCE. Next hearing: 25th March 2026.
C.C. - CRIMINAL CASES
CNR: KAHV020015042018
Next Hearing
25th March 2026
Filing Number
448/2018
Filing Date
23-06-2018
Registration No
448/2018
Registration Date
23-06-2018
Court
PRL. SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND CJM, HAVERI
Judge
352-PRL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State of Karnataka
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
Ravikumar C Patted
Masur Enterprises
Hearing History
Judge: 352-PRL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 11-03-2026 | EVIDENCE |
| 06-03-2026 | EVIDENCE |
| 11-02-2026 | EVIDENCE |
| 21-01-2026 | EVIDENCE |
| 19-12-2025 | EVIDENCE |
Interim Orders
Summary: This is a case judgment (CC No. 448/2018) from the Chief Judicial Magistrate's Court, Haveri, involving criminal proceedings related to fraud and misuse of government coupons. The court found that accused persons fraudulently created 72 coupons using forged authorization documents and caused a loss of Rs. 1,10,808 to the government. The court rejected the defendants' arguments and affirmed that witness statements were properly recorded, documents were appropriately marked as evidence, and the investigation was conducted fairly. The case proceeded to trial with testimony from multiple witnesses and evidence documented in the court record. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: This is a case judgment (CC No. 448/2018) from the Chief Judicial Magistrate's Court, Haveri, involving criminal proceedings related to fraud and misuse of government coupons. The court found that accused persons fraudulently created 72 coupons using forged authorization documents and caused a loss of Rs. 1,10,808 to the government. The court rejected the defendants' arguments and affirmed that witness statements were properly recorded, documents were appropriately marked as evidence, and the investigation was conducted fairly. The case proceeded to trial with testimony from multiple witnesses and evidence documented in the court record. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts