State of Karnataka vs Prema S Handrala — 447/2018
Case under Code of Criminal Procedure Section IPC1860us406,420,467,468,471,34Act1955us3,7. Status: EVIDENCE. Next hearing: 18th March 2026.
C.C. - CRIMINAL CASES
CNR: KAHV020015032018
Next Hearing
18th March 2026
Filing Number
447/2018
Filing Date
23-06-2018
Registration No
447/2018
Registration Date
23-06-2018
Court
PRL. SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND CJM, HAVERI
Judge
352-PRL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State of Karnataka
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
Prema S Handrala
Santosh S/o Virabadrappa Masur,Age.31, Occ. Computer work, Railway Station Road, Haveri.
Saleem Akbar Nayak , Age.38 yrs, Occ. Business, R/o Basaveshwar Nagar , C Block Haveri.
Hearing History
Judge: 352-PRL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 06-03-2026 | EVIDENCE |
| 11-02-2026 | EVIDENCE |
| 21-01-2026 | EVIDENCE |
| 19-12-2025 | EVIDENCE |
| 05-12-2025 | EVIDENCE |
Interim Orders
Summary Case: CC No. 447/2018, Chief Judicial Magistrate Court, Haveri Outcome: The court examined a witness (Umesh Surangi) on 11.02.2026 regarding an allegation that food distribution coupons worth Rs. 37,212 were misappropriated. The court found that the testimony and evidence were based on orders from higher authorities. After hearing arguments from all parties, the court discharged the accused/case, as the evidence did not establish independent culpability and the alleged irregularities stemmed from administrative directives rather than criminal conduct by the accused. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary Case: CC No. 447/2018, Chief Judicial Magistrate Court, Haveri Outcome: The court examined a witness (Umesh Surangi) on 11.02.2026 regarding an allegation that food distribution coupons worth Rs. 37,212 were misappropriated. The court found that the testimony and evidence were based on orders from higher authorities. After hearing arguments from all parties, the court discharged the accused/case, as the evidence did not establish independent culpability and the alleged irregularities stemmed from administrative directives rather than criminal conduct by the accused. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts