State of Karnataka vs Guddappa D Dilleppanavar — 445/2018
Case under Code of Criminal Procedure Section Act1955us7,3,IPC1860us34,406,420,467,468,471. Status: EVIDENCE. Next hearing: 13th March 2026.
C.C. - CRIMINAL CASES
CNR: KAHV020014402018
Next Hearing
13th March 2026
Filing Number
445/2018
Filing Date
12-06-2018
Registration No
445/2018
Registration Date
23-06-2018
Court
PRL. SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND CJM, HAVERI
Judge
352-PRL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State of Karnataka
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
Guddappa D Dilleppanavar
Puttappa S/o Shivappa Baraker, Tq and Dist Haveri.
Hearing History
Judge: 352-PRL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 06-03-2026 | EVIDENCE |
| 11-02-2026 | EVIDENCE |
| 21-01-2026 | EVIDENCE |
| 19-12-2025 | EVIDENCE |
| 05-12-2025 | EVIDENCE |
Interim Orders
Summary Case CC No. 445/2018, Chief Judicial Magistrate Court, Haveri (Kannada) The court examined evidence in a case involving alleged misappropriation of food ration materials worth Rs. 47,610 by accused persons who distributed food coupons under a public distribution scheme to unauthorized individuals. The court found that the witness testimony was contradictory and unreliable regarding whether proper directives were issued by superior authorities. The court dismissed the case, holding that the prosecution failed to establish credible evidence of wrongdoing by the accused and that the case was improperly filed based on insufficient grounds. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary Case CC No. 445/2018, Chief Judicial Magistrate Court, Haveri (Kannada) The court examined evidence in a case involving alleged misappropriation of food ration materials worth Rs. 47,610 by accused persons who distributed food coupons under a public distribution scheme to unauthorized individuals. The court found that the witness testimony was contradictory and unreliable regarding whether proper directives were issued by superior authorities. The court dismissed the case, holding that the prosecution failed to establish credible evidence of wrongdoing by the accused and that the case was improperly filed based on insufficient grounds. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts