State of Karnataka vs Mangala B Handrala — 444/2018
Case under Code of Criminal Procedure Section IPC1860us406,420,467,468,471,34,1955us3,7. Status: EVIDENCE. Next hearing: 25th March 2026.
C.C. - CRIMINAL CASES
CNR: KAHV020014392018
Next Hearing
25th March 2026
Filing Number
444/2018
Filing Date
12-06-2018
Registration No
444/2018
Registration Date
23-06-2018
Court
PRL. SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND CJM, HAVERI
Judge
352-PRL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State of Karnataka
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
Mangala B Handrala
Santosh Virabhadrappa Masur,
Saleem Akbar Nayak , Age.38 yrs, Occ. Business, R/o Basaveshwar Nagar , C Block Haveri.
Hearing History
Judge: 352-PRL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 11-03-2026 | EVIDENCE |
| 06-03-2026 | EVIDENCE |
| 11-02-2026 | EVIDENCE |
| 21-01-2026 | EVIDENCE |
| 19-12-2025 | EVIDENCE |
Interim Orders
Case Summary Case No. CC 444/2018 | Chief Judicial Magistrate Court, Haveri The witness (Jaya Shetter, age 49) testified on 11.03.2026 in a case involving allegations of fraud and misappropriation of ₹51,843 against two accused. The witness denied having knowledge of the accused persons or the case details, and stated the police provided no information. The cross-examination by the prosecution was completed without further examination. No cross-examination by the defense counsel was conducted, and the case proceedings concluded accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary Case No. CC 444/2018 | Chief Judicial Magistrate Court, Haveri The witness (Jaya Shetter, age 49) testified on 11.03.2026 in a case involving allegations of fraud and misappropriation of ₹51,843 against two accused. The witness denied having knowledge of the accused persons or the case details, and stated the police provided no information. The cross-examination by the prosecution was completed without further examination. No cross-examination by the defense counsel was conducted, and the case proceedings concluded accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts