State of Karnataka vs Mangala B Handrala — 444/2018
Case under Code of Criminal Procedure Section IPC1860us406,420,467,468,471,34,1955us3,7. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 25th March 2026.
C.C. - CRIMINAL CASES
CNR: KAHV020014392018
Filing Number
444/2018
Filing Date
12-Jun-2018
Registration No
444/2018
Registration Date
23-Jun-2018
Court
PRL. SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND CJM, HAVERI
Judge
352-Prl Senior CIVIL Judge
Last updated 13-Mar-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.State of Karnataka
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
-
1.Mangala B Handrala
-
2.Santosh Virabhadrappa Masur,
-
3.Saleem Akbar Nayak , Age.38 yrs, Occ. Business, R/o Basaveshwar Nagar , C Block Haveri.
Case History
-
25-Mar-2026
Next hearingPending
-
11-Mar-2026
DepositionView PDF
-
11-Mar-2026
DepositionView PDF
-
11-Mar-2026
DepositionView PDF
-
11-Mar-2026
DepositionView PDF
-
11-Mar-2026
DepositionView PDF
-
11-Mar-2026
DepositionView PDF
-
11-Mar-2026
DepositionView PDF
-
11-Mar-2026
DepositionView PDF
-
11-Mar-2026
DepositionView PDF
Case Summary Case No. CC 444/2018 | Chief Judicial Magistrate Court, Haveri The witness (Jaya Shetter, age 49) testified on 11.03.2026 in a case involving allegations of fraud and misappropriation of ₹51,843 against two accused. The witness denied having knowledge of the accused persons or the case details, and stated the police provided no information. The cross-examination by the prosecution was completed without further examination. No cross-examination by the defense counsel was conducted, and the case proceedings concluded accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
11-Mar-2026
Evidence
Prl Senior CIVIL Judge
-
06-Mar-2026
Evidence
Prl Senior CIVIL Judge
-
11-Feb-2026
DepositionView PDF
-
11-Feb-2026
DepositionView PDF
-
11-Feb-2026
Evidence
Prl Senior CIVIL Judge
-
21-Jan-2026
Evidence
Prl Senior CIVIL Judge
-
19-Dec-2025
Evidence
Prl Senior CIVIL Judge
-
05-Dec-2025
Evidence
Prl Senior CIVIL Judge
-
26-Nov-2025
DepositionView PDF
-
26-Nov-2025
Evidence
Prl Senior CIVIL Judge
-
31-Oct-2025
Evidence
Prl Senior CIVIL Judge
-
10-Oct-2025
Evidence
Prl Senior CIVIL Judge
-
19-Sep-2025
Evidence
Prl Senior CIVIL Judge
-
17-Sep-2025
Objection
Prl Senior CIVIL Judge
-
12-Sep-2025
Objection
Prl Senior CIVIL Judge
-
29-Aug-2025
Evidence
Prl Senior CIVIL Judge
-
22-Aug-2025
Evidence
Prl Senior CIVIL Judge
-
22-Jul-2025
Evidence
Prl Senior CIVIL Judge
-
03-Jul-2025
Evidence
Prl Senior CIVIL Judge
-
25-Jun-2025
Evidence
Prl Senior CIVIL Judge
-
11-Jun-2025
Evidence
Prl Senior CIVIL Judge
-
04-Jun-2025
Evidence
Prl Senior CIVIL Judge
-
29-Jan-2025
Evidence
Prl Senior CIVIL Judge
-
04-Nov-2024
Evidence
Prl Senior CIVIL Judge
-
02-Sep-2024
Framing Of Charge Or Plea
Prl Senior CIVIL Judge
-
06-Jul-2024
Framing Of Charge Or Plea
Prl Senior CIVIL Judge
-
06-May-2024
Framing Of Charge Or Plea
Prl Senior CIVIL Judge
-
04-Mar-2024
Framing Of Charge Or Plea
Prl Senior CIVIL Judge
-
29-Dec-2023
Framing Of Charge Or Plea
Prl Senior CIVIL Judge
-
27-Nov-2023
Framing Of Charge Or Plea
Prl Senior CIVIL Judge
-
25-Sep-2023
Framing Of Charge Or Plea
Prl Senior CIVIL Judge
-
24-Jul-2023
Framing Of Charge Or Plea
Prl Senior CIVIL Judge
-
19-Jun-2023
Framing Of Charge Or Plea
Prl Senior CIVIL Judge
-
20-Mar-2023
Framing Of Charge Or Plea
Prl Senior CIVIL Judge
-
20-Feb-2023
Framing Of Charge Or Plea
Prl Senior CIVIL Judge
-
18-Feb-2023
Framing Of Charge Or Plea
Prl Senior CIVIL Judge
-
21-Dec-2022
Framing Of Charge Or Plea
Prl Senior CIVIL Judge
-
22-Sep-2022
Framing Of Charge Or Plea
Prl Senior CIVIL Judge
-
05-Sep-2022
Framing Of Charge Or Plea
Prl Senior CIVIL Judge
-
23-Jun-2022
Framing Of Charge Or Plea
Prl Senior CIVIL Judge
-
11-May-2022
Framing Of Charge Or Plea
Prl Senior CIVIL Judge
-
19-Mar-2022
Framing Of Charge Or Plea
Prl Senior CIVIL Judge
-
11-Feb-2022
Framing Of Charge Or Plea
Prl Senior CIVIL Judge
-
27-Dec-2021
Framing Of Charge Or Plea
Prl Senior CIVIL Judge
-
22-Oct-2021
Framing Of Charge Or Plea
Prl Senior CIVIL Judge
-
18-Oct-2021
Framing Of Charge Or Plea
Prl Senior CIVIL Judge
-
05-Aug-2021
Framing Of Charge Or Plea
Prl Senior CIVIL Judge
-
09-Jun-2021
Framing Of Charge Or Plea
Prl Senior CIVIL Judge
-
08-Apr-2021
Framing Of Charge Or Plea
Prl Senior CIVIL Judge
-
05-Apr-2021
Framing Of Charge Or Plea
Prl Senior CIVIL Judge
-
31-Mar-2021
Objection
Prl Senior CIVIL Judge
-
25-Feb-2021
OrdersView PDF
-
25-Feb-2021
Framing Of Charge Or Plea
Prl Senior CIVIL Judge
-
22-Feb-2021
Orders
Prl Senior CIVIL Judge
-
03-Feb-2021
Orders
Prl Senior CIVIL Judge
-
20-Jan-2021
Hearing
Prl Senior CIVIL Judge
-
07-Jan-2021
Hearing
Prl Senior CIVIL Judge
-
02-Dec-2020
Objection
Prl Senior CIVIL Judge
-
05-Nov-2020
Objection
Prl Senior CIVIL Judge
-
23-Oct-2020
Hearing
Prl Senior CIVIL Judge
-
14-Oct-2020
Hearing
Prl Senior CIVIL Judge
-
28-Sep-2020
Hearing
Prl Senior CIVIL Judge
-
03-Sep-2020
Objection
Prl Senior CIVIL Judge
-
21-May-2020
Objection
Prl Senior CIVIL Judge
-
16-Mar-2020
Objection
Prl Senior CIVIL Judge
-
03-Feb-2020
Framing Of Charge Or Plea
Prl Senior CIVIL Judge
-
30-Dec-2019
Framing Of Charge Or Plea
Prl Senior CIVIL Judge
-
16-Nov-2019
Framing Of Charge Or Plea
Prl Senior CIVIL Judge
-
25-Sep-2019
Framing Of Charge Or Plea
Prl Senior CIVIL Judge
-
19-Jul-2019
Framing Of Charge Or Plea
Prl Senior CIVIL Judge
-
08-May-2019
Framing Of Charge Or Plea
Prl Senior CIVIL Judge
-
29-Mar-2019
Null
Prl Senior CIVIL Judge
-
01-Feb-2019
Null
Prl Senior CIVIL Judge
-
22-Dec-2018
Null
Prl Senior CIVIL Judge
-
06-Oct-2018
Null
Prl Senior CIVIL Judge
-
20-Jul-2018
Summons
Prl Senior CIVIL Judge
-
25-Jun-2018
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
12-Jun-2018
Case filed
Registration No. 444/2018
Case Summary Case No. CC 444/2018 | Chief Judicial Magistrate Court, Haveri The witness (Jaya Shetter, age 49) testified on 11.03.2026 in a case involving allegations of fraud and misappropriation of ₹51,843 against two accused. The witness denied having knowledge of the accused persons or the case details, and stated the police provided no information. The cross-examination by the prosecution was completed without further examination. No cross-examination by the defense counsel was conducted, and the case proceedings concluded accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts