State of Karnataka vs Lohit Yadavad — 422/2018

Case under Indian Penal Code Section IPC1860us34,406,420,467,468,471. Status: ACCUSSED STATEMENT u/s 313 CrPC. Next hearing: 13th March 2026.

C.C. - CRIMINAL CASES

CNR: KAHV020012322018

ACCUSSED STATEMENT u/s 313 CrPC

Next Hearing

13th March 2026

Filing Number

422/2018

Filing Date

21-04-2018

Registration No

422/2018

Registration Date

21-04-2018

Court

PRL. SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND CJM, HAVERI

Judge

352-PRL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section IPC1860us34,406,420,467,468,471

Petitioner(s)

State of Karnataka

Respondent(s)

Lohit Yadavad

Santosh S/o Veerbhadrappa Masur

Hearing History

Judge: 352-PRL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE

06-03-2026

ACCUSSED STATEMENT u/s 313 CrPC

11-02-2026

EVIDENCE

21-01-2026

EVIDENCE

19-12-2025

EVIDENCE

05-12-2025

EVIDENCE

Interim Orders

05-12-2025
Charge
11-02-2026
Deposition
11-02-2026
Deposition
06-03-2026
Deposition
06-03-2026
Deposition
06-03-2026
Deposition
06-03-2026
Deposition
06-03-2026
Deposition
06-03-2026
Deposition
06-03-2026
Deposition
06-03-2026
Deposition
06-03-2026
Deposition
06-03-2026
Deposition
06-03-2026
Deposition
06-03-2026
Deposition

The Chief Judicial Magistrate Court in Haveri dismissed charges against the accused (Case No. 422/2018). The court found significant procedural irregularities in the investigation, including improper seizure documentation, failure to follow proper witness examination protocols, and insufficient evidence of the alleged crime. The accused were acquitted due to lack of credible proof and procedural violations by the investigating officer. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The Chief Judicial Magistrate Court in Haveri dismissed charges against the accused (Case No. 422/2018). The court found significant procedural irregularities in the investigation, including improper seizure documentation, failure to follow proper witness examination protocols, and insufficient evidence of the alleged crime. The accused were acquitted due to lack of credible proof and procedural violations by the investigating officer. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

PRL. SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND CJM, HAVERI All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case