State of Karnataka vs Dadafer Mardansab Bhusi — 418/2018

Case under Indian Penal Code Section IPC1860506,504,149,420,109. Status: EVIDENCE. Next hearing: 13th March 2026.

C.C. - CRIMINAL CASES

CNR: KAHV020012282018

EVIDENCE

Next Hearing

13th March 2026

Filing Number

418/2018

Filing Date

20-04-2018

Registration No

418/2018

Registration Date

21-04-2018

Court

PRL. SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND CJM, HAVERI

Judge

352-PRL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section IPC1860506,504,149,420,109

Petitioner(s)

State of Karnataka

Respondent(s)

Dadafer Mardansab Bhusi

Anand Harijan

Lokesh Narshimyya

Ramesh Narshimayya

Narashimyya Ramesh

Yashodha Lokesh

Saraswati Narashimayya

Hearing History

Judge: 352-PRL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE

06-03-2026

EVIDENCE

04-03-2026

EVIDENCE

18-02-2026

EVIDENCE

23-01-2026

EVIDENCE

14-01-2026

EVIDENCE

Interim Orders

19-01-2021
Orders
24-10-2025
Charge
03-12-2025
Deposition
04-03-2026
Deposition
04-03-2026
Deposition
04-03-2026
Deposition
04-03-2026
Deposition
04-03-2026
Deposition
04-03-2026
Deposition
04-03-2026
Deposition
06-03-2026
Deposition

This is a court order from the Chief Judicial Magistrate's Court, Haveri (Case No. 418/2018) in Kannada. The witness (Shivappa Sagar, age 56, PSI at Kaginele police station) was sworn in on 06.03.2026. The order records his testimony regarding FIR 308/2016 and documents the examination of exhibits. The court notes that the accused's counsel argued there was insufficient evidence against the accused and questioned the credibility of the case filing. The court concluded there are no further cross-examinations to be conducted. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

This is a court order from the Chief Judicial Magistrate's Court, Haveri (Case No. 418/2018) in Kannada. The witness (Shivappa Sagar, age 56, PSI at Kaginele police station) was sworn in on 06.03.2026. The order records his testimony regarding FIR 308/2016 and documents the examination of exhibits. The court notes that the accused's counsel argued there was insufficient evidence against the accused and questioned the credibility of the case filing. The court concluded there are no further cross-examinations to be conducted. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

PRL. SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND CJM, HAVERI All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case