Honnavva W/o Durugappa Chavadi vs Kariyallappa s/o Kariyappa Belavigi — 99/2025
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section U/o.7R1and3. Status: JUDGEMENT. Next hearing: 28th March 2026.
O.S. - Original Suit
CNR: KAHV020005072025
Next Hearing
28th March 2026
e-Filing Number
02-08-2025
Filing Number
98/2025
Filing Date
05-08-2025
Registration No
99/2025
Registration Date
05-08-2025
Court
PRL. SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND CJM, HAVERI
Judge
930-I ADDL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC HAVERI
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Honnavva W/o Durugappa Chavadi
Adv. Anil Bendre
Gouravva W/o Hanumantappa Chavadi
Adv. Anil Bendre
Hanumavva W/o Nagappa Kambali
Adv. Anil Bendre
Respondent(s)
Kariyallappa s/o Kariyappa Belavigi
Hearing History
Judge: 930-I ADDL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC HAVERI
JUDGEMENT
SUMMONS
ARGUMENTS
ARGUMENTS
ARGUMENTS
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 10-03-2026 | JUDGEMENT |
| 09-03-2026 | SUMMONS |
| 06-03-2026 | ARGUMENTS |
| 02-03-2026 | ARGUMENTS |
| 19-02-2026 | ARGUMENTS |
Interim Orders
Summary: In OS No. 99/2025, the court heard evidence on 03-11-2025 and 13-10-2025, with the plaintiff's counsel (A.M.B.) examining the plaintiff witness. Multiple property-related documents including mutation registers and survey records (referenced as NIP-16 through NIP-19 on the first date, and NIP-1 through NIP-15 on the second date) were submitted and marked as exhibits. Since the defendant did not contest the witness examination, no cross-examination was conducted, and the matter was adjourned for further hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: In OS No. 99/2025, the court heard evidence on 03-11-2025 and 13-10-2025, with the plaintiff's counsel (A.M.B.) examining the plaintiff witness. Multiple property-related documents including mutation registers and survey records (referenced as NIP-16 through NIP-19 on the first date, and NIP-1 through NIP-15 on the second date) were submitted and marked as exhibits. Since the defendant did not contest the witness examination, no cross-examination was conducted, and the matter was adjourned for further hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts