State of Karnataka vs Mahbubsab Challal — 40/2017
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 1860,420,465,34,201. Status: EVIDENCE. Next hearing: 13th March 2026.
C.C. - CRIMINAL CASES
CNR: KAHV020003282017
Next Hearing
13th March 2026
Filing Number
40/2017
Filing Date
14-03-2017
Registration No
40/2017
Registration Date
14-03-2017
Court
PRL. SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND CJM, HAVERI
Judge
352-PRL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State of Karnataka
Respondent(s)
Mahbubsab Challal
Kamrunnisha Challal
Hearing History
Judge: 352-PRL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
JUDGEMENT
ORDERS
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 06-03-2026 | EVIDENCE |
| 20-02-2026 | EVIDENCE |
| 13-02-2026 | EVIDENCE |
| 07-02-2026 | JUDGEMENT |
| 04-02-2026 | ORDERS |
Interim Orders
Summary In this criminal case (CC No. 40/2017) before the Chief Judicial Magistrate's Court in Haveri, the witness (a 56-year-old PSI) testified on March 6, 2026, regarding allegations against two accused persons. The court found that the accused had intentionally destroyed a crucial original donation document and provided false information to police, leading to a charge under IPC Section 201 (destruction of evidence). The defense counsel challenged the investigation, but the court proceeded with the examination of evidence and witnesses, rejecting the defense arguments and continuing the trial proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary In this criminal case (CC No. 40/2017) before the Chief Judicial Magistrate's Court in Haveri, the witness (a 56-year-old PSI) testified on March 6, 2026, regarding allegations against two accused persons. The court found that the accused had intentionally destroyed a crucial original donation document and provided false information to police, leading to a charge under IPC Section 201 (destruction of evidence). The defense counsel challenged the investigation, but the court proceeded with the examination of evidence and witnesses, rejecting the defense arguments and continuing the trial proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts