Drakshayini Rudrayya Akkuramath vs Kotramma Channaveeraswami Hiremath — 39/2017
Case under Order 7 Rule 1 and 3 Cpc Section UO7rule1and3. Status: EVIDENCE. Next hearing: 01st April 2026.
O.S. - Original Suit
CNR: KAHV020002822017
Next Hearing
01st April 2026
Filing Number
39/2017
Filing Date
01-03-2017
Registration No
39/2017
Registration Date
01-03-2017
Court
PRL. SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND CJM, HAVERI
Judge
930-I ADDL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC HAVERI
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Drakshayini Rudrayya Akkuramath
Adv. C G Nagalur
Shobha Basavaraj Sasavihallimath
Respondent(s)
Kotramma Channaveeraswami Hiremath
Soubhagya Mallikarjunayya Veerlingayyanamath
Gangadhar Shivashakrayya Vardimath
Rudrayya urf Babu Shivashankrayya Vardimath(Legal Heir)
Karunakar Somayya Hiremath
Vijaya Basavannayya Hiremath
Lata Rudrayya Hiremath
Fakkiresh Somayya Hiremath
Jayashri Girish Hiremath
Hearing History
Judge: 930-I ADDL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC HAVERI
EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
Objection
ARGUMENTS
ARGUMENTS
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 12-03-2026 | EVIDENCE |
| 09-03-2026 | EVIDENCE |
| 06-03-2026 | Objection |
| 28-02-2026 | ARGUMENTS |
| 24-02-2026 | ARGUMENTS |
Interim Orders
The court order is in Kannada language and contains witness examination records (oath statements) from O.S. No. 39/2017. The document shows ongoing proceedings with witness testimonies recorded on multiple dates (January-February 2026), main arguments presented by counsel for both plaintiffs and defendants, and cross-examinations. The case appears to be a civil suit involving property disputes with multiple scheduled assets being contested among various parties. The final outcome/judgment is not yet delivered—the case remains in the examination and argument stage with further hearings pending. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Deposition
The court order is in Kannada language and contains witness examination records (oath statements) from O.S. No. 39/2017. The document shows ongoing proceedings with witness testimonies recorded on multiple dates (January-February 2026), main arguments presented by counsel for both plaintiffs and defendants, and cross-examinations. The case appears to be a civil suit involving property disputes with multiple scheduled assets being contested among various parties. The final outcome/judgment is not yet delivered—the case remains in the examination and argument stage with further hearings pending. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts