State of Karnataka vs Ninganagouda Somanagouda Patil, Age. 28 Years, R/o Dasharathakoppa Tq Hangal, Haveri. — 38/2022
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 279,304A. Status: ARGUMENTS. Next hearing: 23rd March 2026.
C.C. - CRIMINAL CASES
CNR: KAHV020002242022
Next Hearing
23rd March 2026
Filing Number
38/2022
Filing Date
18-04-2022
Registration No
38/2022
Registration Date
18-04-2022
Court
PRL. SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND CJM, HAVERI
Judge
352-PRL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State of Karnataka
Respondent(s)
Ninganagouda Somanagouda Patil, Age. 28 Years, R/o Dasharathakoppa Tq Hangal, Haveri.
Shireenbanu Abdulrafee Patil, Age. 45 Years, R/o 314 ARD Patel Panchaxari Nagar Navanagar, Hubballi,
Hearing History
Judge: 352-PRL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ARGUMENTS
ACCUSSED STATEMENT u/s 313 CrPC
EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 11-03-2026 | ARGUMENTS |
| 06-03-2026 | ACCUSSED STATEMENT u/s 313 CrPC |
| 18-02-2026 | EVIDENCE |
| 21-01-2026 | EVIDENCE |
| 31-12-2025 | EVIDENCE |
Interim Orders
Summary This is a criminal case (C.C. 38/2022) in which witness examination took place on 06.03.2026. The court recorded the oath of the witness and documented cross-examination testimony regarding allegations of eye surgery, vehicle movements near a sugar factory, and traffic conditions in the area. The witness's credibility was challenged during cross-examination, with statements being contradicted. The examination of the accused is noted as ongoing in court proceedings, and the case continues with further judicial examination scheduled. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary This is a criminal case (C.C. 38/2022) in which witness examination took place on 06.03.2026. The court recorded the oath of the witness and documented cross-examination testimony regarding allegations of eye surgery, vehicle movements near a sugar factory, and traffic conditions in the area. The witness's credibility was challenged during cross-examination, with statements being contradicted. The examination of the accused is noted as ongoing in court proceedings, and the case continues with further judicial examination scheduled. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts