State of Karnataka vs Suresh Siddappa Soppin, Age. 33 Yrs., Occ. Farmer, R/o. Ganajur, Tq., and Dist., Haveri. — 31/2023

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 323,363,325,504,506,34. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 13th March 2026.

Evidence Next hearing 13-Mar-2026 this date has passed

C.C. - CRIMINAL CASES

CNR: KAHV020002122023

Filing Number

31/2023

Filing Date

17-Mar-2023

Registration No

31/2023

Registration Date

17-Mar-2023

Court

PRL. SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND CJM, HAVERI

Judge

352-Prl Senior CIVIL Judge

Last updated 13-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 323,363,325,504,506,34

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.State of Karnataka

    Adv. Sr. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Suresh Siddappa Soppin, Age. 33 Yrs., Occ. Farmer, R/o. Ganajur, Tq., and Dist., Haveri.

  2. 2.Nagappa Yane Nagaraj Tirukappa Pasari, Age. 31 Yrs., Occ. Farmer, R/o. Ganajur, Haveri.

Case History

  1. 13-Mar-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 06-Mar-2026

    Evidence

    Prl Senior CIVIL Judge

  3. 20-Feb-2026

    Evidence

    Prl Senior CIVIL Judge

  4. 21-Jan-2026

    Evidence

    Prl Senior CIVIL Judge

  5. 17-Dec-2025

    Evidence

    Prl Senior CIVIL Judge

  6. 21-Nov-2025

    Evidence

    Prl Senior CIVIL Judge

  7. 10-Oct-2025

    Evidence

    Prl Senior CIVIL Judge

  8. 30-Sep-2025

    Evidence

    Prl Senior CIVIL Judge

  9. 10-Sep-2025

    Evidence

    Prl Senior CIVIL Judge

  10. 20-Aug-2025

    Evidence

    Prl Senior CIVIL Judge

  11. 25-Jul-2025

    Evidence

    Prl Senior CIVIL Judge

  12. 07-Jul-2025

    DepositionView PDF

  13. 07-Jul-2025

    DepositionView PDF

  14. 07-Jul-2025

    DepositionView PDF

    Summary: In Criminal Case No. 31/2023 before the Chief Judicial Magistrate's Court, Haveri, the witness examination concluded on 07.07.2025. The court found the witness testimony regarding a land dispute and alleged abduction/assault case to be lacking credibility and inconsistent. The accused contended that the witness made contradictory statements about identities, property details, and had no direct knowledge of the alleged incident. The court determined that further inquiry was unnecessary and closed the examination phase, indicating insufficient grounds to proceed with the criminal charges based on the witness evidence presented. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  15. 07-Jul-2025

    Evidence

    Prl Senior CIVIL Judge

  16. 26-Jun-2025

    Evidence

    Prl Senior CIVIL Judge

  17. 11-Jun-2025

    Evidence

    Prl Senior CIVIL Judge

  18. 04-Jun-2025

    DepositionView PDF

  19. 04-Jun-2025

    DepositionView PDF

  20. 04-Jun-2025

    Evidence

    Prl Senior CIVIL Judge

  21. 12-Feb-2025

    Evidence

    Prl Senior CIVIL Judge

  22. 12-Dec-2024

    Evidence

    Prl Senior CIVIL Judge

  23. 11-Dec-2024

    Evidence

    Prl Senior CIVIL Judge

  24. 23-Oct-2024

    Evidence

    Prl Senior CIVIL Judge

  25. 14-Aug-2024

    DepositionView PDF

  26. 14-Aug-2024

    Evidence

    Prl Senior CIVIL Judge

  27. 10-Jul-2024

    Evidence

    Prl Senior CIVIL Judge

  28. 01-Jul-2024

    Evidence

    Prl Senior CIVIL Judge

  29. 22-May-2024

    Evidence

    Prl Senior CIVIL Judge

  30. 01-Apr-2024

    DepositionView PDF

  31. 01-Apr-2024

    Evidence

    Prl Senior CIVIL Judge

  32. 28-Feb-2024

    Evidence

    Prl Senior CIVIL Judge

  33. 10-Jan-2024

    Evidence

    Prl Senior CIVIL Judge

  34. 31-Oct-2023

    ChargeView PDF

  35. 31-Oct-2023

    Evidence

    Prl Senior CIVIL Judge

  36. 19-Sep-2023

    Framing Of Charge Or Plea

    Prl Senior CIVIL Judge

  37. 28-Aug-2023

    Framing Of Charge Or Plea

    Prl Senior CIVIL Judge

  38. 19-Jul-2023

    Framing Of Charge Or Plea

    Prl Senior CIVIL Judge

  39. 08-Jul-2023

    Settlement

    Prl Senior CIVIL Judge

  40. 05-Jun-2023

    Settlement

    Prl Senior CIVIL Judge

  41. 17-Mar-2023

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  42. 17-Mar-2023

    Case filed

    Registration No. 31/2023

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: In Criminal Case No. 31/2023 before the Chief Judicial Magistrate's Court, Haveri, the witness examination concluded on 07.07.2025. The court found the witness testimony regarding a land dispute and alleged abduction/assault case to be lacking credibility and inconsistent. The accused contended that the witness made contradictory statements about identities, property details, and had no direct knowledge of the alleged incident. The court determined that further inquiry was unnecessary and closed the examination phase, indicating insufficient grounds to proceed with the criminal charges based on the witness evidence presented. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case