State of Karnataka vs A.1. Faikkirappa Iswarappa Devhihosur urf Devasur — 61/2025
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section U.sec. 79,189(2),191(2),191(3),115(2)118(1)133,351(2),352,190 bns AND u.SEC. 3(`)(6)(3)(1)(S)(3)(2)(. Status: EVIDENCE. Next hearing: 18th March 2026.
SPL.C. SC.ST - SPECIAL CASES (SC/ST) PA.ACT
CNR: KAHV010052342025
Next Hearing
18th March 2026
Filing Number
61/2025
Filing Date
22-12-2025
Registration No
61/2025
Registration Date
22-12-2025
Court
PRL. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, HAVERI
Judge
996-I ADDL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State of Karnataka
Adv. Saroja G. Kudalagimath
Respondent(s)
A.1. Faikkirappa Iswarappa Devhihosur urf Devasur
A.2. Ajjappa Bharmappa Bevinahalli
Bharmappa Fakkirappa Koradur
A.4. Annappa Chayanagouda Patil
A.5. Manjappa Bharmappa Mellali
A.6.,Ramesh NIngappa Niroli
A.7. Soubhagya Fakkirappa Devihosur at Devasur
Hearing History
Judge: 996-I ADDL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE
EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
F.D.T.
Hearing Before Charge
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 06-03-2026 | EVIDENCE |
| 27-02-2026 | EVIDENCE |
| 18-02-2026 | EVIDENCE |
| 05-02-2026 | F.D.T. |
| 20-01-2026 | Hearing Before Charge |
Interim Orders
Summary: In SC/ST Case No.61/2025-Pw-2, the court examined a witness on March 6, 2026, regarding a land dispute involving 30 guntas in Chikkahulli village, Honnali taluk. The court found that the witness gave false testimony based on police statements, with procedural irregularities including lack of proper documentation and absence of required evidence submission. The case was adjourned for further examination before the Additional District and Special Judge. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: In SC/ST Case No.61/2025-Pw-2, the court examined a witness on March 6, 2026, regarding a land dispute involving 30 guntas in Chikkahulli village, Honnali taluk. The court found that the witness gave false testimony based on police statements, with procedural irregularities including lack of proper documentation and absence of required evidence submission. The case was adjourned for further examination before the Additional District and Special Judge. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts