The State of Karnataka vs NINGAPPA BASAVANTAPPA HOLAL — 53/2025
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 3(1)(r)SC.ST. Status: EVIDENCE. Next hearing: 26th March 2026.
SPL.C. SC.ST - SPECIAL CASES (SC/ST) PA.ACT
CNR: KAHV010044812025
Next Hearing
26th March 2026
e-Filing Number
15-09-2025
Filing Number
53/2025
Filing Date
25-10-2025
Registration No
53/2025
Registration Date
25-10-2025
Court
PRL. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, HAVERI
Judge
996-I ADDL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
The State of Karnataka
Respondent(s)
NINGAPPA BASAVANTAPPA HOLAL
VIJAYAKUMAR BASAVANTAPPA HOLAL
Adv. null
SHIVAKUMAR CHANNABASAPPA HOLAL
Adv. null
SHAMBULINGAPPA CHANNABASAPPA HOLAL
Adv. null
RUDRAPPA NAGAPPA HOLAL
Adv. null
NAGAPPA RUDRAPPA HOLAL
Adv. null
Hearing History
Judge: 996-I ADDL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE
EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 06-03-2026 | EVIDENCE |
| 27-02-2026 | EVIDENCE |
| 17-02-2026 | EVIDENCE |
| 03-02-2026 | EVIDENCE |
| 08-01-2026 | EVIDENCE |
Interim Orders
This document is a witness deposition transcript, not a court order with a final outcome. Dr. Bibiaisha testified on 27.02.2026 before the Special SC/ST Court at Haveri regarding her medical examination of three assault victims (Pw-1, Pw-4, and Pw-5), all of whom showed no external visible injuries despite reported assaults on 20.06.2025. The witness maintained her testimony during cross-examination that she properly examined the victims and issued wound certificates, rejecting suggestions of false certification. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
This document is a witness deposition transcript, not a court order with a final outcome. Dr. Bibiaisha testified on 27.02.2026 before the Special SC/ST Court at Haveri regarding her medical examination of three assault victims (Pw-1, Pw-4, and Pw-5), all of whom showed no external visible injuries despite reported assaults on 20.06.2025. The witness maintained her testimony during cross-examination that she properly examined the victims and issued wound certificates, rejecting suggestions of false certification. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts