Rafiqahamad Mehanuddin Borgi vs The Management of NWKRTC, Haveri Division Rby Divisional Controller Haveri Division, Haveri — 16/2018
Case under Industrial Disputes Act Section 10(4-A). Status: JUDGMENTS. Next hearing: 13th March 2026.
KID 10-4(A) - Industrial Court Main Cases
CNR: KAHV010036552018
Next Hearing
13th March 2026
Filing Number
16/2018
Filing Date
04-12-2018
Registration No
16/2018
Registration Date
07-12-2018
Court
PRL. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, HAVERI
Judge
572-PRL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Rafiqahamad Mehanuddin Borgi
Adv. M H Bhat
Respondent(s)
The Management of NWKRTC, Haveri Division Rby Divisional Controller Haveri Division, Haveri
Hearing History
Judge: 572-PRL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE
JUDGMENTS
ARGUMENTS
ARGUMENTS
ARGUMENTS
ARGUMENTS
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 06-03-2026 | JUDGMENTS |
| 18-02-2026 | ARGUMENTS |
| 06-02-2026 | ARGUMENTS |
| 20-01-2026 | ARGUMENTS |
| 12-01-2026 | ARGUMENTS |
Interim Orders
Summary: In case KID No.16/2018 RW-2 before the Principal District Chief Civil Judge in Haveri, the court heard arguments from both sides on 24/07/2025. The respondent's counsel submitted that the witness was examined and oath was administered. The applicant's counsel stated that the opposing party (who filed as respondent) has not been properly served and is a retired person residing in Belgaum, and raised concerns about lack of personal knowledge of the case. The court noted there is no further hearing required and disposed of the matter accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: In case KID No.16/2018 RW-2 before the Principal District Chief Civil Judge in Haveri, the court heard arguments from both sides on 24/07/2025. The respondent's counsel submitted that the witness was examined and oath was administered. The applicant's counsel stated that the opposing party (who filed as respondent) has not been properly served and is a retired person residing in Belgaum, and raised concerns about lack of personal knowledge of the case. The court noted there is no further hearing required and disposed of the matter accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts