Rafiqahamad Mehanuddin Borgi vs The Management of NWKRTC, Haveri Division Rby Divisional Controller Haveri Division, Haveri — 16/2018

Case under Industrial Disputes Act Section 10(4-A). Status: Judgments. Next hearing: 13th March 2026.

Judgments Next hearing 13-Mar-2026 this date has passed

KID 10-4(A) - Industrial Court Main Cases

CNR: KAHV010036552018

Filing Number

16/2018

Filing Date

04-Dec-2018

Registration No

16/2018

Registration Date

07-Dec-2018

Court

PRL. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, HAVERI

Judge

572-Prl District And Sessions Judge

Last updated 13-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

Industrial Disputes Act Section 10(4-A)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Rafiqahamad Mehanuddin Borgi

    Adv. M H Bhat

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.The Management of NWKRTC, Haveri Division Rby Divisional Controller Haveri Division, Haveri

Case History

  1. 13-Mar-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 06-Mar-2026

    Judgments

    Prl District And Sessions Judge

  3. 18-Feb-2026

    Arguments

    Prl District And Sessions Judge

  4. 06-Feb-2026

    Arguments

    Prl District And Sessions Judge

  5. 20-Jan-2026

    Arguments

    Prl District And Sessions Judge

  6. 12-Jan-2026

    Arguments

    Prl District And Sessions Judge

  7. 11-Dec-2025

    Arguments

    Prl District And Sessions Judge

  8. 01-Dec-2025

    Arguments

    Prl District And Sessions Judge

  9. 19-Nov-2025

    Arguments

    Prl District And Sessions Judge

  10. 07-Nov-2025

    Arguments

    Prl District And Sessions Judge

  11. 24-Oct-2025

    Arguments

    Prl District And Sessions Judge

  12. 10-Oct-2025

    Arguments

    Prl District And Sessions Judge

  13. 16-Sep-2025

    Arguments

    Prl District And Sessions Judge

  14. 01-Sep-2025

    Arguments

    Prl District And Sessions Judge

  15. 18-Aug-2025

    Arguments

    Prl District And Sessions Judge

  16. 31-Jul-2025

    Arguments

    Prl District And Sessions Judge

  17. 24-Jul-2025

    DepositionView PDF

    Summary: In case KID No.16/2018 RW-2 before the Principal District Chief Civil Judge in Haveri, the court heard arguments from both sides on 24/07/2025. The respondent's counsel submitted that the witness was examined and oath was administered. The applicant's counsel stated that the opposing party (who filed as respondent) has not been properly served and is a retired person residing in Belgaum, and raised concerns about lack of personal knowledge of the case. The court noted there is no further hearing required and disposed of the matter accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  18. 24-Jul-2025

    Arguments

    Prl District And Sessions Judge

  19. 17-Jul-2025

    DepositionView PDF

  20. 17-Jul-2025

    Evidence

    Prl District And Sessions Judge

  21. 08-Jul-2025

    Evidence

    Prl District And Sessions Judge

  22. 25-Jun-2025

    Evidence

    Prl District And Sessions Judge

  23. 05-Jun-2025

    Evidence

    Prl District And Sessions Judge

  24. 24-Apr-2025

    Evidence

    Prl District And Sessions Judge

  25. 31-Jan-2025

    Evidence

    Prl District And Sessions Judge

  26. 08-Jan-2025

    Evidence

    Prl District And Sessions Judge

  27. 30-Oct-2024

    Evidence

    Prl District And Sessions Judge

  28. 18-Sep-2024

    Evidence

    Prl District And Sessions Judge

  29. 14-Aug-2024

    OrdersView PDF

  30. 14-Aug-2024

    Evidence

    Prl District And Sessions Judge

  31. 01-Aug-2024

    Orders

    Prl District And Sessions Judge

  32. 11-Jul-2024

    Hearing

    Prl District And Sessions Judge

  33. 27-Jun-2024

    Further Arguments

    Prl District And Sessions Judge

  34. 18-Jun-2024

    Hearing

    Prl District And Sessions Judge

  35. 23-Apr-2024

    Hearing

    Prl District And Sessions Judge

  36. 02-Apr-2024

    Hearing

    Prl District And Sessions Judge

  37. 11-Mar-2024

    Hearing

    Prl District And Sessions Judge

  38. 20-Feb-2024

    Objections

    Prl District And Sessions Judge

  39. 06-Feb-2024

    Evidence

    Prl District And Sessions Judge

  40. 09-Jan-2024

    Arguments

    Prl District And Sessions Judge

  41. 05-Dec-2023

    Arguments

    Prl District And Sessions Judge

  42. 10-Oct-2023

    Arguments

    Prl District And Sessions Judge

  43. 05-Sep-2023

    Arguments

    Prl District And Sessions Judge

  44. 18-Jul-2023

    Arguments

    Prl District And Sessions Judge

  45. 20-Jun-2023

    Arguments

    Prl District And Sessions Judge

  46. 24-Apr-2023

    Arguments

    Prl District And Sessions Judge

  47. 28-Mar-2023

    Arguments

    Prl District And Sessions Judge

  48. 14-Mar-2023

    Arguments

    Prl District And Sessions Judge

  49. 14-Feb-2023

    DepositionView PDF

  50. 14-Feb-2023

    Arguments

    Prl District And Sessions Judge

  51. 24-Jan-2023

    DepositionView PDF

  52. 24-Jan-2023

    Further Evidence

    Prl District And Sessions Judge

  53. 19-Dec-2022

    Evidence

    Prl District And Sessions Judge

  54. 22-Nov-2022

    Evidence

    Prl District And Sessions Judge

  55. 18-Oct-2022

    Evidence

    Prl District And Sessions Judge

  56. 27-Sep-2022

    Evidence

    Prl District And Sessions Judge

  57. 06-Sep-2022

    Evidence

    Prl District And Sessions Judge

  58. 02-Aug-2022

    Evidence

    Prl District And Sessions Judge

  59. 21-Jun-2022

    Evidence

    Prl District And Sessions Judge

  60. 29-Apr-2022

    Evidence

    Prl District And Sessions Judge

  61. 05-Apr-2022

    Evidence

    Prl District And Sessions Judge

  62. 09-Mar-2022

    Evidence

    Prl District And Sessions Judge

  63. 18-Jan-2022

    Evidence

    Prl District And Sessions Judge

  64. 17-Dec-2021

    Issues

    Prl District And Sessions Judge

  65. 14-Dec-2021

    Call on

    Prl District And Sessions Judge

  66. 23-Nov-2021

    Call on

    Prl District And Sessions Judge

  67. 07-Sep-2021

    Issues

    Prl District And Sessions Judge

  68. 08-Jun-2021

    Objections

    Prl District And Sessions Judge

  69. 03-Apr-2021

    Objections

    Prl District And Sessions Judge

  70. 23-Feb-2021

    Objections

    Prl District And Sessions Judge

  71. 18-Dec-2020

    Objections

    Prl District And Sessions Judge

  72. 10-Nov-2020

    Objections

    Prl District And Sessions Judge

  73. 21-Sep-2020

    Objections

    Prl District And Sessions Judge

  74. 23-Jul-2020

    Objections

    Prl District And Sessions Judge

  75. 23-Jul-2020

    Objections

    Prl District And Sessions Judge

  76. 23-Jul-2020

    Objections

    Prl District And Sessions Judge

  77. 01-Jun-2020

    Objections

    Prl District And Sessions Judge

  78. 26-Mar-2020

    Objections

    Prl District And Sessions Judge

  79. 05-Feb-2020

    Objections

    Prl District And Sessions Judge

  80. 27-Dec-2019

    Objections

    Prl District And Sessions Judge

  81. 08-Nov-2019

    Objections

    Prl District And Sessions Judge

  82. 05-Oct-2019

    Objections

    Prl District And Sessions Judge

  83. 16-Sep-2019

    Objections

    Prl District And Sessions Judge

  84. 03-Aug-2019

    Objections

    Prl District And Sessions Judge

  85. 30-May-2019

    Objections

    Prl District And Sessions Judge

  86. 03-Apr-2019

    Objections

    Prl District And Sessions Judge

  87. 04-Feb-2019

    Objections

    Prl District And Sessions Judge

  88. 10-Dec-2018

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  89. 04-Dec-2018

    Case filed

    Registration No. 16/2018

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: In case KID No.16/2018 RW-2 before the Principal District Chief Civil Judge in Haveri, the court heard arguments from both sides on 24/07/2025. The respondent's counsel submitted that the witness was examined and oath was administered. The applicant's counsel stated that the opposing party (who filed as respondent) has not been properly served and is a retired person residing in Belgaum, and raised concerns about lack of personal knowledge of the case. The court noted there is no further hearing required and disposed of the matter accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case