M/S Shriram Finance Limited., Rep by P A Holder., Sri. Mutturaj S/o Siddappa Hurakadli vs Abhi Kattimani S/o Somanaik — 219/2025

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 21Rule11. Disposed: Uncontested--DISPOSED OTHERWISE on 23rd March 2026.

Case disposed

EX - Execution Petition Under Order

CNR: KAHV010023382025

Filing Number

221/2025

Filing Date

09-Jun-2025

Registration No

219/2025

Registration Date

09-Jun-2025

Court

PRL. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, HAVERI

Judge

572-Prl District And Sessions Judge

Decision Date

23-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--DISPOSED OTHERWISE

Last updated 26-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section 21Rule11
Arbitration and Conciliation Act Section 36

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.M/S Shriram Finance Limited., Rep by P A Holder., Sri. Mutturaj S/o Siddappa Hurakadli

    Adv. G.N.GOWDA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Abhi Kattimani S/o Somanaik

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 23-Mar-2026

    Orders

    Case Summary: EX/219/2025 The Haveri District and Sessions Court rejected the petition filed by Shriram Finance Limited and others against Abhi Kattimani because the counsel for the Defendant/Respondent failed to take any steps in the case. The court ordered closure of the petition and directed return of all documents and refund of any security amount deposited, if claimed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 23-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Prl District And Sessions Judge

  4. 03-Feb-2026

    Steps

    Prl District And Sessions Judge

  5. 01-Dec-2025

    Notice

    Prl District And Sessions Judge

  6. 08-Oct-2025

    Steps

    Prl District And Sessions Judge

  7. 28-Aug-2025

    Steps

    Prl District And Sessions Judge

  8. 11-Jun-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  9. 09-Jun-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 219/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: EX/219/2025 The Haveri District and Sessions Court rejected the petition filed by Shriram Finance Limited and others against Abhi Kattimani because the counsel for the Defendant/Respondent failed to take any steps in the case. The court ordered closure of the petition and directed return of all documents and refund of any security amount deposited, if claimed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case