Lokesh M. L. S/o. Ningegowda vs Ramu S.P. S/o. Palani B. R. — 83/2022
Case under Under Sec 200 Crpc Section 138,142 NI Act. Disposed: Uncontested--DISMISSED on 25th April 2026.
P.C.R. - PRIVATE COMPLAINTS
CNR: KAHS810009642022
Filing Number
83/2022
Filing Date
03-Jun-2022
Registration No
83/2022
Registration Date
03-Jun-2022
Court
CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, SAKLESHPURA
Judge
351-Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC
Decision Date
25-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--DISMISSED
Last updated 20-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Lokesh M. L. S/o. Ningegowda
Adv. S.V. Shanmukha
Respondent(s)
-
1.Ramu S.P. S/o. Palani B. R.
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
25-Apr-2026
OrdersView PDF
The Sakaleshpura court dismissed Lokesh's application seeking to condone a 274-day delay in filing a cheque bounce complaint under the Negotiable Instruments Act. The court rejected his claims of illness and personal issues as inadequate grounds for the substantial delay, noting he produced no medical evidence and his oral testimony alone was insufficient. Consequently, both the delay condonation application and the underlying case were dismissed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
25-Apr-2026
Disposed
Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
16-Apr-2026
Orders
Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
07-Apr-2026
Orders
Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
27-Mar-2026
Orders
Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
18-Mar-2026
Orders
Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
13-Mar-2026
Orders
Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
07-Mar-2026
Orders
Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
02-Mar-2026
Orders
Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
19-Feb-2026
Orders
Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
21-Jan-2026
Hearing
Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
15-Dec-2025
Hearing
Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
28-Nov-2025
DepositionView PDF
-
28-Nov-2025
Hearing
Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
21-Nov-2025
Call on
Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
03-Nov-2025
Call on
Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
13-Oct-2025
Call on
Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
23-Sep-2025
Call on
Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
28-Aug-2025
Sworn Statement
Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
02-Aug-2025
Hearing
Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
24-Jul-2025
Hearing
Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
14-Jul-2025
Hearing
Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
03-Jun-2025
Hearing
Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
23-Apr-2025
Hearing
Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
17-Apr-2025
Orders
Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
05-Apr-2025
Orders
Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
01-Apr-2025
Orders
Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
18-Mar-2025
Orders
Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
07-Mar-2025
Orders
Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
25-Feb-2025
Orders
Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
13-Feb-2025
Orders
Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
21-Jan-2025
Hearing
Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
07-Jan-2025
Hearing
Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
04-Dec-2024
Notice
Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
23-Oct-2024
Notice
Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
13-Sep-2024
Notice
Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
08-Aug-2024
Notice
Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
24-Jun-2024
Notice
Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
02-Apr-2024
Notice
Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
20-Jan-2024
Notice
Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
15-Nov-2023
Notice
Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
24-Aug-2023
Notice
Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
08-Jul-2023
Call on
Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
26-Apr-2023
A.D.R.
Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
09-Mar-2023
Notice
Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
27-Jan-2023
Notice
Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
28-Dec-2022
Notice
Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
15-Dec-2022
Notice
Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
29-Oct-2022
Notice
Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
26-Sep-2022
Sworn Statement
Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
29-Aug-2022
Sworn Statement
Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
20-Aug-2022
Sworn Statement
Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
16-Aug-2022
Sworn Statement
Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
20-Jul-2022
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
03-Jun-2022
Case filed
Registration No. 83/2022
The Sakaleshpura court dismissed Lokesh's application seeking to condone a 274-day delay in filing a cheque bounce complaint under the Negotiable Instruments Act. The court rejected his claims of illness and personal issues as inadequate grounds for the substantial delay, noting he produced no medical evidence and his oral testimony alone was insufficient. Consequently, both the delay condonation application and the underlying case were dismissed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts