Uday K J vs Yashash H N — 327/2022
Case under 138 of N.i Act Section 142. Status: Arguments. Next hearing: 27th June 2026.
C.C. - CRIMINAL CASES
CNR: KAHS810005782022
Filing Number
327/2022
Filing Date
17-Mar-2022
Registration No
327/2022
Registration Date
17-Mar-2022
Court
CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, SAKLESHPURA
Judge
351-Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC
Last updated 20-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Uday K J
Adv. S R Chandrappa
Respondent(s)
-
1.Yashash H N
Case History
-
27-Jun-2026
Next hearingPending
-
20-Jun-2026
Arguments
Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
11-Jun-2026
DepositionView PDF
In CC No. 327/2022 between Uday K J and Yashash H N, the court (J.M.F.C, Sakaleshpur) heard the matter on 11-06-2026. The court examined the accused's defense regarding a document under Section 08, finding the accused had not signed it and that the document was fabricated. The court rejected the accused's contentions and ordered no further examination. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
11-Jun-2026
Arguments
Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
02-Jun-2026
Evidence
Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
13-May-2026
Evidence
Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
22-Apr-2026
Objection
Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
15-Apr-2026
Objection
Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
07-Apr-2026
Arguments
Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
27-Mar-2026
Arguments
Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
18-Mar-2026
Arguments
Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
13-Mar-2026
DepositionView PDF
-
13-Mar-2026
Arguments
Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
05-Mar-2026
Evidence
Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
18-Feb-2026
Evidence
Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
29-Jan-2026
DepositionView PDF
-
29-Jan-2026
Evidence
Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
13-Dec-2025
Call on
Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
01-Dec-2025
A.D.R.
Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
07-Nov-2025
Evidence
Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
24-Oct-2025
Evidence
Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
11-Sep-2025
Evidence
Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
05-Aug-2025
Call on
Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
30-Jul-2025
NBW to accused
Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
18-Jun-2025
NBW to accused
Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
25-Apr-2025
NBW to accused
Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
21-Mar-2025
Evidence
Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
28-Feb-2025
Evidence
Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
10-Feb-2025
Evidence
Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
20-Jan-2025
Evidence
Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
30-Dec-2024
Evidence
Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
13-Dec-2024
Evidence
Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
08-Nov-2024
Evidence
Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
23-Oct-2024
Evidence
Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
04-Oct-2024
Evidence
Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
09-Aug-2024
Evidence
Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
26-Jul-2024
Evidence
Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
19-Jul-2024
313 StatementView PDF
-
19-Jul-2024
PleaView PDF
-
19-Jul-2024
Defence Evidence
Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
18-Jul-2024
Framing Of Charge Or Plea
Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
16-Jul-2024
Call on
Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
11-Jun-2024
NBW to accused
Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
22-Mar-2024
NBW to accused
Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
19-Jan-2024
NBW to accused
Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
15-Nov-2023
NBW to accused
Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
03-Oct-2023
NBW to accused
Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
03-Aug-2023
NBW to accused
Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
08-Jul-2023
Call on
Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
24-Jun-2023
A.D.R
Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
24-Mar-2023
A.D.R
Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
11-Feb-2023
Call on
Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
23-Dec-2022
A.D.R
Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
27-Oct-2022
NBW to accused
Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
29-Sep-2022
NBW to accused
Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
29-Aug-2022
Call on
Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
20-Aug-2022
Call on
Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
21-Jul-2022
A.D.R.
Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
10-Jun-2022
NBW to accused
Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
04-May-2022
Notice
Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
05-Apr-2022
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
17-Mar-2022
Case filed
Registration No. 327/2022
In CC No. 327/2022 between Uday K J and Yashash H N, the court (J.M.F.C, Sakaleshpur) heard the matter on 11-06-2026. The court examined the accused's defense regarding a document under Section 08, finding the accused had not signed it and that the document was fabricated. The court rejected the accused's contentions and ordered no further examination. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts