Krishnamurthy vs The Chief Secretary, TMC, Sakaleshpura — 129/2026
Case under Registration of Births and Deaths Act Section 13(3). Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE on 18th March 2026.
Crl.Misc. - CRIMINAL MISC.CASES
CNR: KAHS810005052026
Filing Number
129/2026
Filing Date
06-Mar-2026
Registration No
129/2026
Registration Date
06-Mar-2026
Court
CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, SAKLESHPURA
Judge
351-Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC
Decision Date
18-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE
Last updated 20-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Krishnamurthy
Adv. K.K. Manjunath
Respondent(s)
-
1.The Chief Secretary, TMC, Sakaleshpura
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
18-Mar-2026
Orders
Case Summary: Krishnamurthy v. The Chief Officer, TMC, Sakaleshpura (129/2026) The court allowed Krishnamurthy's petition under Section 13(3) of the Registration of Births and Deaths Act, directing the Sakaleshpura Town Municipal Corporation to register his date of birth as 03.07.1977 and issue a birth certificate. The petitioner's birth was never registered because his parents failed to notify the authorities, and he required the certificate for government benefits. The court found sufficient grounds based on his testimony and supporting documents (study certificate showing his birth date), noting that under Section 13(3), proof of the birth itself—rather than the specific date—is the material consideration. The entry was made non-conclusive pending any future disputes on the actual date of birth. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
18-Mar-2026
Disposed
Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
16-Mar-2026
Exhibits
-
16-Mar-2026
Orders
Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
06-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
06-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 129/2026
Case Summary: Krishnamurthy v. The Chief Officer, TMC, Sakaleshpura (129/2026) The court allowed Krishnamurthy's petition under Section 13(3) of the Registration of Births and Deaths Act, directing the Sakaleshpura Town Municipal Corporation to register his date of birth as 03.07.1977 and issue a birth certificate. The petitioner's birth was never registered because his parents failed to notify the authorities, and he required the certificate for government benefits. The court found sufficient grounds based on his testimony and supporting documents (study certificate showing his birth date), noting that under Section 13(3), proof of the birth itself—rather than the specific date—is the material consideration. The entry was made non-conclusive pending any future disputes on the actual date of birth. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts