Kamalamma vs Ramakrishna — 547/2025

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section O7Rule1,2. Status: Summons. Next hearing: 11th August 2026.

Summons Next hearing 11-Aug-2026

O.S. - Original Suit

CNR: KAHS710020612025

Filing Number

550/2025

Filing Date

21-Nov-2025

Registration No

547/2025

Registration Date

21-Nov-2025

Court

CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, HOLENARSIPURA

Judge

593-Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC

Last updated 20-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section O7Rule1,2

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Kamalamma

    Adv. H R JAYARAMA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Ramakrishna

  2. 2.Raajeshwari

  3. 3.Shridhara

  4. 4.Chandra

Case History

  1. 11-Aug-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 04-Jun-2026

    Summons

    Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  3. 18-Mar-2026

    Summons

    Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  4. 12-Jan-2026

    Summons

    Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  5. 22-Nov-2025

    OrdersView PDF

    Summary of Case 547/2025 Petitioner: Kamalamma Respondents: Ramakrishna, Raajeshwari, Shridhara The court allowed Kamalamma's interim application (I.A. No. I) seeking ex-parte temporary injunction under Order XXXIX Rule 3 of CPC. The court found a prima-facie case that the suit schedule properties are joint family properties in which Kamalamma holds an equal share, and that the respondents were attempting to alienate them. The court issued an ex-parte temporary injunction restraining the respondents from alienating the properties until the next hearing date, while also restraining the petitioner from doing so. Suit summons were issued to defendants returnable by specified dates upon payment of prescribed court fees. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  6. 22-Nov-2025

    Summons

    Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  7. 21-Nov-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  8. 21-Nov-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 547/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Summary of Case 547/2025 Petitioner: Kamalamma Respondents: Ramakrishna, Raajeshwari, Shridhara The court allowed Kamalamma's interim application (I.A. No. I) seeking ex-parte temporary injunction under Order XXXIX Rule 3 of CPC. The court found a prima-facie case that the suit schedule properties are joint family properties in which Kamalamma holds an equal share, and that the respondents were attempting to alienate them. The court issued an ex-parte temporary injunction restraining the respondents from alienating the properties until the next hearing date, while also restraining the petitioner from doing so. Suit summons were issued to defendants returnable by specified dates upon payment of prescribed court fees. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case