Revanna vs The Tahashildar — 119/2026
Case under Registration of Births and Deaths Act Section 13(3). Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE on 14th July 2026.
Crl.Misc. - CRIMINAL MISC.CASES
CNR: KAHS710006582026
Filing Number
119/2026
Filing Date
07-Apr-2026
Registration No
119/2026
Registration Date
07-Apr-2026
Court
CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, HOLENARSIPURA
Judge
593-Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC
Decision Date
14-Jul-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE
Last updated 17-Jul-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Revanna
Adv. Bharatha C P
-
2.Shekhara
Respondent(s)
-
1.The Tahashildar
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
14-Jul-2026
Orders
Case Summary: 119/2026 The court allowed the petition by Revanna and Shekhara under Section 13(3) of the Registration of Births and Deaths Act, directing the Tahasildar to register and issue a death certificate for their mother Kalamma (W/o. Mallesha), who died on 11.11.2023. The petitioners had orally notified the death but the Tahasildar failed to register it; the court found sufficient evidence through affidavit, genealogical records, and newspaper publications, with no objections filed despite public notice. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
14-Jul-2026
Disposed
Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
22-Jun-2026
Deposition
-
22-Jun-2026
Orders
Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
26-May-2026
Petitioner Evidence
Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
08-Apr-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
07-Apr-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 119/2026
Case Summary: 119/2026 The court allowed the petition by Revanna and Shekhara under Section 13(3) of the Registration of Births and Deaths Act, directing the Tahasildar to register and issue a death certificate for their mother Kalamma (W/o. Mallesha), who died on 11.11.2023. The petitioners had orally notified the death but the Tahasildar failed to register it; the court found sufficient evidence through affidavit, genealogical records, and newspaper publications, with no objections filed despite public notice. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts