Revanna vs The Tahashildar — 118/2026

Case under Registration of Births and Deaths Act Section 13(3). Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE on 14th July 2026.

Case disposed

Crl.Misc. - CRIMINAL MISC.CASES

CNR: KAHS710006572026

Filing Number

118/2026

Filing Date

07-Apr-2026

Registration No

118/2026

Registration Date

07-Apr-2026

Court

CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, HOLENARSIPURA

Judge

593-Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC

Decision Date

14-Jul-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE

Last updated 17-Jul-2026

Acts & Sections

Registration of Births and Deaths Act Section 13(3)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Revanna

    Adv. Bharatha C P

  2. 2.Shekhara

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.The Tahashildar

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Jul-2026

    Orders

    Case 118/2026 Summary The court allowed the petition filed by Revanna and Shekhara seeking registration of their father Mallesha's death (02.12.2024) under the Births and Deaths Registration Act. The Tahasildar had failed to register the death despite oral notification, leading to the Respondent issuing a non-availability certificate. The court found the petitioners proved the death through genealogical tree affidavits, newspaper publications, and witness testimony, directing the Tahasildar to enter the death in official registers and issue a death extract upon fee payment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Jul-2026

    Disposed

    Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  4. 22-Jun-2026

    Deposition

  5. 22-Jun-2026

    Orders

    Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  6. 26-May-2026

    Petitioner Evidence

    Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  7. 08-Apr-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  8. 07-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 118/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case 118/2026 Summary The court allowed the petition filed by Revanna and Shekhara seeking registration of their father Mallesha's death (02.12.2024) under the Births and Deaths Registration Act. The Tahasildar had failed to register the death despite oral notification, leading to the Respondent issuing a non-availability certificate. The court found the petitioners proved the death through genealogical tree affidavits, newspaper publications, and witness testimony, directing the Tahasildar to enter the death in official registers and issue a death extract upon fee payment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case