Mahesha L P vs The Tahashildar — 108/2026

Case under Registration of Births and Deaths Act Section 13(3). Status: Arguments. Next hearing: 17th July 2026.

Arguments Next hearing 17-Jul-2026 this date has passed

Crl.Misc. - CRIMINAL MISC.CASES

CNR: KAHS710006132026

Filing Number

108/2026

Filing Date

26-Mar-2026

Registration No

108/2026

Registration Date

26-Mar-2026

Court

CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, HOLENARSIPURA

Judge

1040-I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC

Last updated 17-Jul-2026

Acts & Sections

Registration of Births and Deaths Act Section 13(3)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Mahesha L P

    Adv. K P Shivkumar

  2. 2.Kalyanamma

  3. 3.Earaiah

  4. 4.Basavarajaiah

  5. 5.Sannaiah S

  6. 6.S B Shankaraiah

  7. 7.Lakshmamma

  8. 8.Nagamma

  9. 9.Rathnamma

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.The Tahashildar

Case History

  1. 17-Jul-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 17-Jun-2026

    Deposition

    On 17.06.2026, the court examined witness PW-1 in case 108/2026. The petitioners (Mahesha L P, Kalyanamma, and Earaiah) submitted an affidavit with supporting documents including a family tree, notarized Aadhaar cards, and public notices. Since the respondent (Tahashildar) did not contest the petition, no cross-examination was conducted. The case was adjourned for further proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 17-Jun-2026

    Arguments

    I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  4. 03-Jun-2026

    Petitioner Evidence

    I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  5. 26-May-2026

    Notice

    I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  6. 27-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 26-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 108/2026

casestatus.in Summary

On 17.06.2026, the court examined witness PW-1 in case 108/2026. The petitioners (Mahesha L P, Kalyanamma, and Earaiah) submitted an affidavit with supporting documents including a family tree, notarized Aadhaar cards, and public notices. Since the respondent (Tahashildar) did not contest the petition, no cross-examination was conducted. The case was adjourned for further proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case