Papanna @ Lakshma vs Sharadhamma — 154/2022
Case under U/o 7 Rule 1 of Cpc R/w 26. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 23rd July 2026.
O.S. - Original Suit
CNR: KAHS700017342022
Filing Number
155/2022
Filing Date
15-Dec-2022
Registration No
154/2022
Registration Date
15-Dec-2022
Court
SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, HOLENARSIPURA
Judge
342-Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC
Last updated 20-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Papanna @ Lakshma
Adv. M R RAVI
Respondent(s)
-
1.Sharadhamma
-
2.Ratnamma
-
3.Sunil
-
4.Bhabu
-
5.Deepu
-
6.Nirmal
-
7.Aravinda Jadhav
-
8.Thriniesha
-
9.Venkatesha
-
10.Lakshmi
-
11.Shrinivasa
-
12.Pavithra
-
13.Nirmala
-
14.Mohana Kumar
-
15.Palakshi
-
16.Neeri
-
17.Raghu
-
18.Ganga
Case History
-
23-Jul-2026
Next hearingPending
-
10-Jun-2026
DepositionView PDF
CASE SUMMARY: OS No. 154/2022 The court dismissed the petition filed by Papanna @ Lakshma against Sharadhamma, Ratnamma, and Sunil. The petitioner claimed a share in disputed property, but the court found that all property in question was registered in the name of Rajamma on 06.09.1965 through a registered deed, and subsequently included in an earlier case (OS No. 194/1988). The court determined the petitioner had no legal right or interest in the properties and rejected the claim that he held joint ownership. The petition was dismissed on substantive grounds. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
10-Jun-2026
Evidence
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
22-Apr-2026
Evidence
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
18-Mar-2026
Evidence
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
11-Feb-2026
Evidence
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
31-Jan-2026
Evidence
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
17-Dec-2025
Evidence
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
04-Nov-2025
Evidence
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
09-Oct-2025
Evidence
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
08-Sep-2025
Evidence
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
20-Aug-2025
Evidence
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
23-Jul-2025
Evidence
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
19-Jun-2025
DepositionView PDF
-
19-Jun-2025
Evidence
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
02-May-2025
Evidence
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
09-Apr-2025
Evidence
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
19-Mar-2025
DepositionView PDF
-
19-Mar-2025
Evidence
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
18-Feb-2025
Evidence
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
07-Jan-2025
Evidence
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
30-Nov-2024
Evidence
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
25-Nov-2024
Issues
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
19-Nov-2024
Issues
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
08-Nov-2024
Issues
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
29-Oct-2024
Issues
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
10-Sep-2024
Summons
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
02-Sep-2024
Summons
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
14-Aug-2024
Summons
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
20-Jul-2024
Summons
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
09-Jul-2024
Summons
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
30-May-2024
Summons
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
06-Mar-2024
Issues
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
14-Feb-2024
Objections
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
30-Jan-2024
Objections
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
19-Dec-2023
Objections
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
08-Nov-2023
Summons
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
07-Oct-2023
Summons
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
05-Aug-2023
Notice
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
18-Jul-2023
Notice
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
20-Apr-2023
Notice
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
13-Feb-2023
Notice
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
16-Jan-2023
Notice
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
16-Dec-2022
Notice
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
15-Dec-2022
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
15-Dec-2022
Case filed
Registration No. 154/2022
CASE SUMMARY: OS No. 154/2022 The court dismissed the petition filed by Papanna @ Lakshma against Sharadhamma, Ratnamma, and Sunil. The petitioner claimed a share in disputed property, but the court found that all property in question was registered in the name of Rajamma on 06.09.1965 through a registered deed, and subsequently included in an earlier case (OS No. 194/1988). The court determined the petitioner had no legal right or interest in the properties and rejected the claim that he held joint ownership. The petition was dismissed on substantive grounds. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts