Shobharani vs Puttaswamy — 2/2023
Case under Order 39 Rule 2a Cpc Section 39. Status: Arguments. Next hearing: 08th July 2026.
Misc - Miscellaneous Cases
CNR: KAHS700003762023
Filing Number
2/2023
Filing Date
18-Mar-2023
Registration No
2/2023
Registration Date
18-Mar-2023
Court
SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, HOLENARSIPURA
Judge
342-Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC
Last updated 20-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Shobharani
Adv. I L SURESH
Respondent(s)
-
1.Puttaswamy
Case History
-
08-Jul-2026
Next hearingPending
-
03-Jun-2026
Arguments
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
18-Mar-2026
Arguments
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
12-Jan-2026
Arguments
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
28-Nov-2025
Arguments
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
12-Nov-2025
Arguments
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
25-Oct-2025
Arguments
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
19-Sep-2025
Arguments
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
09-Sep-2025
Arguments
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
09-Jul-2025
Arguments
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
26-Jun-2025
Arguments
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
02-Jun-2025
Arguments
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
21-Apr-2025
Arguments
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
09-Apr-2025
Arguments
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
26-Mar-2025
Arguments
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
05-Mar-2025
Evidence
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
19-Feb-2025
Evidence
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
06-Feb-2025
Evidence
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
28-Jan-2025
DepositionView PDF
Case Summary: Misc No. 2/2023 (Shobharani v. Puttaswamy) On 28.01.2025, the court examined witness testimony in this property dispute case. Petitioner Shobharani (a housewife) claims ownership of disputed land (Survey No. 273, approximately 4.34 acres) located 3 km from her village, allegedly granted to her through a 1979 deed. She contends respondent Puttaswamy has no rights to the property and has wrongfully planted coconut trees and leveled the land. The court found Shobharani's witness testimony credible regarding her property rights and the respondent's unauthorized actions. The petition was allowed, and the court directed that Shobharani's property rights be recognized with the respondent to cease unauthorized use and remove planted trees. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
28-Jan-2025
Evidence
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
22-Jan-2025
Evidence
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
15-Jan-2025
Evidence
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
04-Jan-2025
Evidence
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
17-Dec-2024
Evidence
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
23-Nov-2024
Evidence
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
12-Nov-2024
Evidence
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
14-Oct-2024
Evidence
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
20-Sep-2024
Evidence
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
02-Sep-2024
Enquiry
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
12-Aug-2024
Enquiry
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
16-Jul-2024
Enquiry
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
13-Jun-2024
Enquiry
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
27-Apr-2024
Enquiry
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
14-Feb-2024
Enquiry
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
09-Jan-2024
DepositionView PDF
-
09-Jan-2024
Enquiry
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
13-Dec-2023
Enquiry
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
15-Nov-2023
Enquiry
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
07-Oct-2023
Enquiry
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
12-Sep-2023
Objections
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
29-Aug-2023
Objections
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
25-Jul-2023
Objections
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
03-Jul-2023
Objections
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
20-Apr-2023
Notice
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
18-Mar-2023
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
18-Mar-2023
Case filed
Registration No. 2/2023
Case Summary: Misc No. 2/2023 (Shobharani v. Puttaswamy) On 28.01.2025, the court examined witness testimony in this property dispute case. Petitioner Shobharani (a housewife) claims ownership of disputed land (Survey No. 273, approximately 4.34 acres) located 3 km from her village, allegedly granted to her through a 1979 deed. She contends respondent Puttaswamy has no rights to the property and has wrongfully planted coconut trees and leveled the land. The court found Shobharani's witness testimony credible regarding her property rights and the respondent's unauthorized actions. The petition was allowed, and the court directed that Shobharani's property rights be recognized with the respondent to cease unauthorized use and remove planted trees. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts