Hallimysore Police Station. vs Avinash — 61/2022

Case under Ipc 1860 Section 279,304(A)ofIPC. Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 01st June 2026.

Case disposed

C.C. - CRIMINAL CASES

CNR: KAHS700003672022

e-Filing Number

26-04-2022

Filing Number

61/2022

Filing Date

26-Apr-2022

Registration No

61/2022

Registration Date

26-Apr-2022

Court

SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, HOLENARSIPURA

Judge

342-Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC

Decision Date

01-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ACQUITTED

Last updated 20-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

0205

Police Station

HALLYMYSORE PS

Year

2021

Acts & Sections

Ipc 1860 Section 279,304(A)ofIPC
U/s 185 Imv Act Section 187

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Hallimysore Police Station.

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Avinash

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 01-Jun-2026

    Judgment

    Case Summary: CC 61/2022 Court Decision: The accused Avinash was acquitted of all charges under IPC Sections 279 (rash driving) and 304-M (causing death by negligence), and Motor Vehicles Act Section 187. The court found the prosecution failed to prove the charges beyond reasonable doubt due to contradictory and unreliable witness testimony. Facts: On December 15, 2021, Avinash allegedly drove his motorcycle recklessly at high speed and collided with a four-wheeler carrying Ramegowda, resulting in Ramegowda's death on December 25, 2021. The prosecution alleged the accused neither provided medical assistance nor informed police. Key Finding: Despite examining 14 witnesses, the prosecution's key witnesses (including the complainant and eyewitness) gave testimony inconsistent with the charges, contradicting the main facts of the case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 01-Jun-2026

    Disposed

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  4. 25-May-2026

    Judgement

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  5. 18-May-2026

    Arguments

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  6. 21-Apr-2026

    Arguments

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  7. 18-Apr-2026

    Arguments

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  8. 04-Apr-2026

    Arguments

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  9. 18-Mar-2026

    Arguments

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  10. 06-Mar-2026

    Arguments

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  11. 28-Feb-2026

    Arguments

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  12. 21-Feb-2026

    Deposition

  13. 21-Feb-2026

    Accussed Statement u/s 313 CrPC

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  14. 03-Feb-2026

    Evidence

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  15. 24-Jan-2026

    Orders

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  16. 03-Jan-2026

    Deposition

  17. 03-Jan-2026

    Objections

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  18. 28-Nov-2025

    Summons

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  19. 17-Oct-2025

    Deposition

  20. 17-Oct-2025

    Appearance Of Accussed

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  21. 12-Sep-2025

    Appearance Of Accussed

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  22. 11-Jul-2025

    Summons

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  23. 20-Jun-2025

    Evidence

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  24. 28-Apr-2025

    Evidence

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  25. 26-Apr-2025

    Evidence

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  26. 21-Mar-2025

    Deposition

  27. 21-Mar-2025

    Evidence

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  28. 20-Feb-2025

    Evidence

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  29. 10-Jan-2025

    Evidence

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  30. 22-Nov-2024

    Evidence

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  31. 27-Sep-2024

    Evidence

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  32. 23-Aug-2024

    Evidence

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  33. 05-Jul-2024

    Evidence

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  34. 29-May-2024

    Deposition

  35. 29-May-2024

    Evidence

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  36. 27-Mar-2024

    Evidence

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  37. 13-Feb-2024

    Deposition

  38. 13-Feb-2024

    Evidence

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  39. 30-Jan-2024

    Evidence

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  40. 29-Dec-2023

    Evidence

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  41. 17-Nov-2023

    Deposition

  42. 17-Nov-2023

    Evidence

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  43. 21-Oct-2023

    Evidence

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  44. 05-Oct-2023

    Evidence

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  45. 30-Aug-2023

    Deposition

  46. 30-Aug-2023

    Evidence

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  47. 10-Aug-2023

    Deposition

  48. 10-Aug-2023

    Evidence

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  49. 21-Jul-2023

    Evidence

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  50. 26-Jun-2023

    Evidence

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  51. 08-May-2023

    Deposition

  52. 08-May-2023

    Evidence

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  53. 21-Mar-2023

    Evidence

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  54. 17-Feb-2023

    Evidence

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  55. 17-Jan-2023

    Evidence

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  56. 22-Dec-2022

    Evidence

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  57. 14-Oct-2022

    Framing Of Charge Or Plea

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  58. 15-Jul-2022

    Framing Of Charge Or Plea

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  59. 26-Apr-2022

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  60. 26-Apr-2022

    Case filed

    Registration No. 61/2022

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CC 61/2022 Court Decision: The accused Avinash was acquitted of all charges under IPC Sections 279 (rash driving) and 304-M (causing death by negligence), and Motor Vehicles Act Section 187. The court found the prosecution failed to prove the charges beyond reasonable doubt due to contradictory and unreliable witness testimony. Facts: On December 15, 2021, Avinash allegedly drove his motorcycle recklessly at high speed and collided with a four-wheeler carrying Ramegowda, resulting in Ramegowda's death on December 25, 2021. The prosecution alleged the accused neither provided medical assistance nor informed police. Key Finding: Despite examining 14 witnesses, the prosecution's key witnesses (including the complainant and eyewitness) gave testimony inconsistent with the charges, contradicting the main facts of the case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case