Erajamma vs The Tahashildar, Holenarsipura — 13/2026

Case under Registration of Births and Deaths Act Section 13(3). Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE on 19th June 2026.

Case disposed

Crl.Misc. - CRIMINAL MISC.CASES

CNR: KAHS700001282026

Filing Number

13/2026

Filing Date

05-Feb-2026

Registration No

13/2026

Registration Date

05-Feb-2026

Court

SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, HOLENARSIPURA

Judge

342-Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC

Decision Date

19-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE

Last updated 20-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Registration of Births and Deaths Act Section 13(3)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Erajamma

    Adv. M R Manjegowda

  2. 2.Parvathamma

  3. 3.Murthy

  4. 4.Ramesha B S

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.The Tahashildar, Holenarsipura

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 19-Jun-2026

    Disposed

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  3. 08-Jun-2026

    Arguments

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  4. 01-Jun-2026

    DepositionView PDF

    Case Summary: 13/2026 The court heard testimony on 01.06.2026 from petitioners Erajamma, Parvathamma, and Murthy against the Tahashildar, Holenarsipura. The petitioners' counsel presented evidence including family tree documents, property certificates, Aadhar card copies, and newspaper publications (Vijayavani and Prakashaman dated 05.04.2026), all marked as exhibits. The court found the case to be unilateral with no opposition from the respondent, and the matter was disposed of accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  5. 01-Jun-2026

    Arguments

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  6. 18-May-2026

    Notice

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  7. 18-Mar-2026

    Notice

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  8. 05-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  9. 05-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 13/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: 13/2026 The court heard testimony on 01.06.2026 from petitioners Erajamma, Parvathamma, and Murthy against the Tahashildar, Holenarsipura. The petitioners' counsel presented evidence including family tree documents, property certificates, Aadhar card copies, and newspaper publications (Vijayavani and Prakashaman dated 05.04.2026), all marked as exhibits. The court found the case to be unilateral with no opposition from the respondent, and the matter was disposed of accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case