Govindegowda vs K.N.Nagaraju — 1417/2024
Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 25th June 2026.
C.C. - CRIMINAL CASES
CNR: KAHS610035772024
Filing Number
1417/2024
Filing Date
13-Nov-2024
Registration No
1417/2024
Registration Date
13-Nov-2024
Court
PRL.CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, CHANNARAYAPATNA
Judge
350-Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
Last updated 20-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Govindegowda
Adv. K.N. SUNDAR RAJ
Respondent(s)
-
1.K.N.Nagaraju
Case History
-
25-Jun-2026
Next hearingPending
-
11-May-2026
Evidence
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
04-Apr-2026
DepositionView PDF
This is a civil case (CC No. 1417/2024) heard in Karnataka involving petitioner Govindegowda and respondent K.N. Nagaraju. The witness testified on 04.04.2026 regarding a money transaction: Govindegowda claimed he lent money to Nagaraju on 21.01.2024 at his home, providing 500 and 300 rupee notes without documentation. A check for Rs. 1,50,000 was issued but bounced due to insufficient funds. The case was adjourned to allow respondent's counsel to present counter-arguments. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
04-Apr-2026
Evidence
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
18-Mar-2026
Evidence
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
21-Jan-2026
Evidence
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
15-Nov-2025
Evidence
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
20-Sep-2025
Evidence
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
17-Jul-2025
Accussed Statement u/s 313 CrPC
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
26-May-2025
Accussed Statement u/s 313 CrPC
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
21-Feb-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
13-Nov-2024
Case filed
Registration No. 1417/2024
This is a civil case (CC No. 1417/2024) heard in Karnataka involving petitioner Govindegowda and respondent K.N. Nagaraju. The witness testified on 04.04.2026 regarding a money transaction: Govindegowda claimed he lent money to Nagaraju on 21.01.2024 at his home, providing 500 and 300 rupee notes without documentation. A check for Rs. 1,50,000 was issued but bounced due to insufficient funds. The case was adjourned to allow respondent's counsel to present counter-arguments. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts