Venkategowda D K vs Srinivasa — 332/2025
Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138. Status: Sworn Statement. Next hearing: 07th August 2026.
P.C.R. - PRIVATE COMPLAINTS
CNR: KAHS610018882025
Filing Number
332/2025
Filing Date
06-Jun-2025
Registration No
332/2025
Registration Date
06-Jun-2025
Court
PRL.CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, CHANNARAYAPATNA
Judge
350-Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
Last updated 20-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Venkategowda D K
Adv. C.B.HEMANTH KUMAR
Respondent(s)
-
1.Srinivasa
Case History
-
07-Aug-2026
Next hearingPending
-
16-May-2026
Sworn Statement
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
08-Apr-2026
OrdersView PDF
Case 332/2025 Summary: The court allowed petitioner Venkategowda D K's application under Section 142(b) of the Negotiable Instruments Act to condone a 279-day delay in filing a private complaint. The court took cognizance of the offense under Section 138 of the NI Act, citing the petitioner's ill-health and personal inconvenience as reasons for the delay, and noting the respondent's non-appearance and lack of objection. The matter was scheduled for sworn statement proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
08-Apr-2026
Sworn Statement
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
18-Mar-2026
Orders
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
27-Feb-2026
Orders
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
06-Feb-2026
Arguments.
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
30-Dec-2025
Arguments.
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
15-Nov-2025
Notice
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
16-Sep-2025
Notice
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
22-Jul-2025
Notice
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
06-Jun-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
06-Jun-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 332/2025
Case 332/2025 Summary: The court allowed petitioner Venkategowda D K's application under Section 142(b) of the Negotiable Instruments Act to condone a 279-day delay in filing a private complaint. The court took cognizance of the offense under Section 138 of the NI Act, citing the petitioner's ill-health and personal inconvenience as reasons for the delay, and noting the respondent's non-appearance and lack of objection. The matter was scheduled for sworn statement proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts