Lakshmamma vs Mahesha — 188/2022
Case under U/s 125 of Cr Pc Section 125. Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 26th May 2026.
Crl.Misc. - CRIMINAL MISC.CASES
CNR: KAHS600011892022
Filing Number
189/2022
Filing Date
09-Nov-2022
Registration No
188/2022
Registration Date
09-Nov-2022
Court
SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, CHANNARAYAPATNA
Judge
653-CIVIL Judge (Sr.dn.)
Decision Date
26-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISMISSED
Last updated 17-Jul-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Lakshmamma
Adv. K B Kumara Kaggere
Respondent(s)
-
1.Mahesha
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
26-May-2026
Judgment
Case Summary: Lakshmamma v. Mahesha (C.Mis/188/2022) The court dismissed Lakshmamma's petition seeking ₹20,000 monthly maintenance from her stepson Mahesha under Section 125 of the Criminal Procedure Code. The court held that the word "mother" in Section 125(1)(d) refers only to a natural mother who has given birth to the child, not a stepmother, after extensively analyzing dictionary definitions and prior case law. Additionally, the court found that Lakshmamma had a natural daughter who was well-to-do and capable of maintaining her, and owned property in her own name, making her ineligible for maintenance from a stepson. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
26-May-2026
Disposed
CIVIL Judge (Sr.dn.)
-
17-Apr-2026
Judgement
CIVIL Judge (Sr.dn.)
-
28-Mar-2026
Judgement
CIVIL Judge (Sr.dn.)
-
18-Mar-2026
Arguments.
CIVIL Judge (Sr.dn.)
-
13-Mar-2026
Arguments.
CIVIL Judge (Sr.dn.)
-
02-Mar-2026
Arguments.
CIVIL Judge (Sr.dn.)
-
16-Feb-2026
Evidence
CIVIL Judge (Sr.dn.)
-
05-Feb-2026
Evidence
CIVIL Judge (Sr.dn.)
-
21-Jan-2026
Evidence
CIVIL Judge (Sr.dn.)
-
19-Dec-2025
Evidence
CIVIL Judge (Sr.dn.)
-
08-Dec-2025
Evidence
CIVIL Judge (Sr.dn.)
-
24-Nov-2025
Evidence
CIVIL Judge (Sr.dn.)
-
12-Nov-2025
Deposition
-
12-Nov-2025
Evidence
CIVIL Judge (Sr.dn.)
-
09-Oct-2025
Evidence
CIVIL Judge (Sr.dn.)
-
12-Sep-2025
Evidence
CIVIL Judge (Sr.dn.)
-
23-Aug-2025
Evidence
CIVIL Judge (Sr.dn.)
-
06-Aug-2025
Deposition
-
06-Aug-2025
Evidence
CIVIL Judge (Sr.dn.)
-
02-Jul-2025
Evidence
CIVIL Judge (Sr.dn.)
-
18-Jun-2025
Evidence
CIVIL Judge (Sr.dn.)
-
09-Jun-2025
Evidence
CIVIL Judge (Sr.dn.)
-
06-Jun-2025
Evidence
CIVIL Judge (Sr.dn.)
-
24-Apr-2025
Evidence
CIVIL Judge (Sr.dn.)
-
09-Apr-2025
Evidence
CIVIL Judge (Sr.dn.)
-
22-Mar-2025
Evidence
CIVIL Judge (Sr.dn.)
-
27-Feb-2025
Evidence
CIVIL Judge (Sr.dn.)
-
04-Feb-2025
Deposition
-
04-Feb-2025
Evidence
CIVIL Judge (Sr.dn.)
-
01-Feb-2025
Evidence
CIVIL Judge (Sr.dn.)
-
23-Jan-2025
Evidence
CIVIL Judge (Sr.dn.)
-
08-Jan-2025
Evidence
CIVIL Judge (Sr.dn.)
-
05-Dec-2024
Evidence
CIVIL Judge (Sr.dn.)
-
12-Nov-2024
Evidence.
CIVIL Judge (Sr.dn.)
-
15-Oct-2024
Evidence.
CIVIL Judge (Sr.dn.)
-
10-Sep-2024
Evidence.
CIVIL Judge (Sr.dn.)
-
21-Aug-2024
Evidence.
CIVIL Judge (Sr.dn.)
-
19-Jul-2024
Deposition
-
19-Jul-2024
Evidence.
CIVIL Judge (Sr.dn.)
-
13-Jun-2024
Evidence
CIVIL Judge (Sr.dn.)
-
27-Mar-2024
Evidence
CIVIL Judge (Sr.dn.)
-
31-Jan-2024
Evidence
CIVIL Judge (Sr.dn.)
-
07-Dec-2023
Evidence
CIVIL Judge (Sr.dn.)
-
25-Sep-2023
Evidence
CIVIL Judge (Sr.dn.)
-
29-Aug-2023
Evidence
CIVIL Judge (Sr.dn.)
-
28-Jul-2023
Evidence
CIVIL Judge (Sr.dn.)
-
24-Jun-2023
Arguments.
CIVIL Judge (Sr.dn.)
-
27-Apr-2023
Arguments.
CIVIL Judge (Sr.dn.)
-
24-Mar-2023
Arguments.
CIVIL Judge (Sr.dn.)
-
27-Jan-2023
Arguments.
CIVIL Judge (Sr.dn.)
-
21-Dec-2022
Arguments.
CIVIL Judge (Sr.dn.)
-
20-Dec-2022
Arguments.
CIVIL Judge (Sr.dn.)
-
19-Dec-2022
Hearing
CIVIL Judge (Sr.dn.)
-
17-Dec-2022
Hearing
CIVIL Judge (Sr.dn.)
-
16-Dec-2022
Hearing
CIVIL Judge (Sr.dn.)
-
10-Nov-2022
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
09-Nov-2022
Case filed
Registration No. 188/2022
Case Summary: Lakshmamma v. Mahesha (C.Mis/188/2022) The court dismissed Lakshmamma's petition seeking ₹20,000 monthly maintenance from her stepson Mahesha under Section 125 of the Criminal Procedure Code. The court held that the word "mother" in Section 125(1)(d) refers only to a natural mother who has given birth to the child, not a stepmother, after extensively analyzing dictionary definitions and prior case law. Additionally, the court found that Lakshmamma had a natural daughter who was well-to-do and capable of maintaining her, and owned property in her own name, making her ineligible for maintenance from a stepson. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts