NAGAIAH ALIAS RAJU vs THE THAHASILDAR, BIRTH AND DEATH REGISTRAR, C.R PATNA — 63/2026
Case under Registration of Births and Deaths Act Section 13(3). Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE on 08th June 2026.
Crl.Misc. - CRIMINAL MISC.CASES
CNR: KAHS600004502026
Filing Number
63/2026
Filing Date
18-May-2026
Registration No
63/2026
Registration Date
18-May-2026
Court
SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, CHANNARAYAPATNA
Judge
653-CIVIL Judge (Sr.dn.)
Decision Date
08-Jun-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE
Last updated 17-Jul-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.NAGAIAH ALIAS RAJU
Adv. K.MADHUSUDAHAN
Respondent(s)
-
1.THE THAHASILDAR, BIRTH AND DEATH REGISTRAR, C.R PATNA
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
08-Jun-2026
Orders
Case Summary: Nagaiah Alias Raju v. The Tahsildar, Birth and Death Registrar Decision: The court allowed the petitioner's application under Section 13(3) of the Registration of Birth and Deaths Act, 1969, and directed the respondent to register the petitioner's birth as 01.01.1953 and issue a birth certificate. The petitioner, aged 73, sought late registration of his birth as his illiterate parents failed to report it timely, and he needed the certificate for passport purposes. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
08-Jun-2026
Disposed
CIVIL Judge (Sr.dn.)
-
06-Jun-2026
Orders
CIVIL Judge (Sr.dn.)
-
03-Jun-2026
Deposition
-
03-Jun-2026
Hearing
CIVIL Judge (Sr.dn.)
-
26-May-2026
Notice
CIVIL Judge (Sr.dn.)
-
21-May-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
18-May-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 63/2026
Case Summary: Nagaiah Alias Raju v. The Tahsildar, Birth and Death Registrar Decision: The court allowed the petitioner's application under Section 13(3) of the Registration of Birth and Deaths Act, 1969, and directed the respondent to register the petitioner's birth as 01.01.1953 and issue a birth certificate. The petitioner, aged 73, sought late registration of his birth as his illiterate parents failed to report it timely, and he needed the certificate for passport purposes. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts