SHANTHAMMA vs TAHSHILDAR, TALUK OFFICE, CHANNARAYAPATNA — 62/2026
Case under Registration of Births and Deaths Act Section 13(3). Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE on 29th May 2026.
Crl.Misc. - CRIMINAL MISC.CASES
CNR: KAHS600003932026
Filing Number
62/2026
Filing Date
22-Apr-2026
Registration No
62/2026
Registration Date
22-Apr-2026
Court
SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, CHANNARAYAPATNA
Judge
653-CIVIL Judge (Sr.dn.)
Decision Date
29-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE
Last updated 17-Jul-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.SHANTHAMMA
Adv. DS UMESH
-
2.ARUN KUMAR
-
3.LINGARAJU
-
4.GURUPRASAD
Respondent(s)
-
1.TAHSHILDAR, TALUK OFFICE, CHANNARAYAPATNA
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
29-May-2026
Orders
Case Summary: 62/2026 The court allowed the petitioners' petition under Section 13(3) of the Registration of Births and Deaths Act, directing the Tahsildar to register the death of Ningajamma W/o Sannananjegowda as 15.06.1970. The court accepted unchallenged testimony from petitioner Arun Kumar establishing the death and location, noting the Tahsildar had previously issued only a non-availability certificate despite the death being over 50 years old and required for revenue record mutation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
29-May-2026
Disposed
CIVIL Judge (Sr.dn.)
-
27-May-2026
Deposition
-
27-May-2026
Orders
CIVIL Judge (Sr.dn.)
-
26-May-2026
Evidence
CIVIL Judge (Sr.dn.)
-
25-May-2026
Notice
CIVIL Judge (Sr.dn.)
-
23-Apr-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
22-Apr-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 62/2026
Case Summary: 62/2026 The court allowed the petitioners' petition under Section 13(3) of the Registration of Births and Deaths Act, directing the Tahsildar to register the death of Ningajamma W/o Sannananjegowda as 15.06.1970. The court accepted unchallenged testimony from petitioner Arun Kumar establishing the death and location, noting the Tahsildar had previously issued only a non-availability certificate despite the death being over 50 years old and required for revenue record mutation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts