THE STATE OF KARNATAKA, SHRAVANABELAGOLA PS vs Dhanendra S E — 40/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nyay Sanhita Section 331(3),331(4),305. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 21st July 2026.
C.C. - CRIMINAL CASES
CNR: KAHS600002302026
e-Filing Number
27-02-2026
Filing Number
40/2026
Filing Date
27-Feb-2026
Registration No
40/2026
Registration Date
27-Feb-2026
Court
SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, CHANNARAYAPATNA
Judge
653-CIVIL Judge (Sr.dn.)
Last updated 17-Jul-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
0148
Police Station
SHRAVANABELAGOLA PS
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.THE STATE OF KARNATAKA, SHRAVANABELAGOLA PS (Police Station)
Respondent(s)
-
1.Dhanendra S E
Case History
-
21-Jul-2026
Next hearingPending
-
02-Jul-2026
Evidence
CIVIL Judge (Sr.dn.)
-
17-Jun-2026
Deposition
Case Summary: CC 40/2026 Petitioner: The State of Karnataka (Shravanabelagola PS) Respondent: Dhanendra S E On 17.06.2026, witness examination proceeded with oath administration. The witness testimony addressed a document (NiPi-12) identified during cross-examination and photographs (NiPi-13 and 14). The witness disputed the prosecution's claims regarding document authenticity and circumstances of evidence collection on 08.01.2026, denying false testimony allegations. The court found the witness statement credible and concluded examination. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
17-Jun-2026
Evidence
CIVIL Judge (Sr.dn.)
-
03-Jun-2026
Evidence
CIVIL Judge (Sr.dn.)
-
26-May-2026
Evidence
CIVIL Judge (Sr.dn.)
-
28-Apr-2026
Evidence
CIVIL Judge (Sr.dn.)
-
21-Apr-2026
Deposition
-
21-Apr-2026
Deposition
-
21-Apr-2026
Deposition
-
21-Apr-2026
Evidence
CIVIL Judge (Sr.dn.)
-
08-Apr-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
27-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 40/2026
Case Summary: CC 40/2026 Petitioner: The State of Karnataka (Shravanabelagola PS) Respondent: Dhanendra S E On 17.06.2026, witness examination proceeded with oath administration. The witness testimony addressed a document (NiPi-12) identified during cross-examination and photographs (NiPi-13 and 14). The witness disputed the prosecution's claims regarding document authenticity and circumstances of evidence collection on 08.01.2026, denying false testimony allegations. The court found the witness statement credible and concluded examination. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts