ESHWARAPPA vs MAHESH D S — 499/2025
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 7rule1,Sec.26. Status: Callon. Next hearing: 23rd June 2026.
O.S. - Original Suit
CNR: KAHS510024162025
Filing Number
499/2025
Filing Date
04-Dec-2025
Registration No
499/2025
Registration Date
04-Dec-2025
Court
CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, BELUR
Judge
349-Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC
Last updated 20-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.ESHWARAPPA
Adv. B S RAJASHEKARA
Respondent(s)
-
1.MAHESH D S
Case History
-
23-Jun-2026
Next hearingPending
-
18-Mar-2026
Callon
Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
10-Feb-2026
Callon
Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
07-Feb-2026
OrdersView PDF
Case Summary: O.S. No. 499/2025 Court: Civil Judge and JMFC, Belur Decided: 07-02-2026 Outcome: Temporary injunction GRANTED in favor of plaintiff Eshwarappa against defendant Mahesh D.S. The court restrained the defendant and his associates from interfering with the plaintiff's possession and enjoyment of the suit property (12 guntas of land in Survey No. 52, Danayakanahalli Village) until disposal of the suit. The court found the plaintiff had established prima facie title through government grant documents and RTC entries, outweighing the defendant's contradictory Mahazar report. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
07-Feb-2026
Issues
Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
03-Feb-2026
Orders
Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
02-Feb-2026
Hearing in IA
Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
19-Jan-2026
Written Statement
Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
12-Jan-2026
Written Statement
Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
05-Jan-2026
Written Statement
Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
11-Dec-2025
Appearance Of Party
Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
04-Dec-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
04-Dec-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 499/2025
Case Summary: O.S. No. 499/2025 Court: Civil Judge and JMFC, Belur Decided: 07-02-2026 Outcome: Temporary injunction GRANTED in favor of plaintiff Eshwarappa against defendant Mahesh D.S. The court restrained the defendant and his associates from interfering with the plaintiff's possession and enjoyment of the suit property (12 guntas of land in Survey No. 52, Danayakanahalli Village) until disposal of the suit. The court found the plaintiff had established prima facie title through government grant documents and RTC entries, outweighing the defendant's contradictory Mahazar report. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts