PUTTASWAMY vs GIRIJAMMA Advocate - C M Chandregowda — 494/2022

Case under Order 7 Rule 1 Cpc. Status: Evidence.. Next hearing: 09th July 2026.

Evidence. Next hearing 09-Jul-2026

O.S. - Original Suit

CNR: KAHS510022482022

Filing Number

494/2022

Filing Date

17-Dec-2022

Registration No

494/2022

Registration Date

17-Dec-2022

Court

CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, BELUR

Judge

1570-I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC

Last updated 20-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Order 7 Rule 1 Cpc

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.PUTTASWAMY

    Adv. SN LINGESH

  2. 2.SHIVALINGAIAH

    Adv. SN LINGESH

  3. 3.SHANTHAPPA

    Adv. SN LINGESH

  4. 4.NANJAPPA(Legal Heir) 4.

  5. 5.GANGAMMA 4.

  6. 6.RAVINDRA 4.

  7. 7.C PRAKASHA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.GIRIJAMMA Advocate - C M Chandregowda

  2. 2.DARMARAJ

    Adv. C M Chandregowda

  3. 3.SUDHARANI

  4. 4.ASHARANI

  5. 5.PREETHI

Case History

  1. 09-Jul-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 22-Apr-2026

    Evidence.

    I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  3. 18-Mar-2026

    Evidence.

    I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  4. 22-Jan-2026

    Evidence.

    I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  5. 04-Dec-2025

    Evidence

    I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  6. 23-Oct-2025

    Evidence

    I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  7. 10-Sep-2025

    DepositionView PDF

    Summary of Case 494/2022 Petitioner(s): Puttaswamy, Shivalingaiah, and Shanthappa Respondent(s): Girijamma, C M Chandregowda, Darmaraj, and Sudharani Order Status: The case was heard on 10-09-2025 with witness examination. The court recorded witness testimony regarding disputed property (Survey No. 1/1) in Danayaknahalli village and claims concerning property allocation, compensation, and inheritance rights among family members. The matter involves contested property distribution following a house and land submersion, with disputes over compensation amounts received by different family members and property ownership documentation. The proceedings were adjourned with the court directing further clarification on the legal standing and property entitlements of the petitioners. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  8. 10-Sep-2025

    Evidence

    I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  9. 15-Jul-2025

    Evidence

    I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  10. 22-Apr-2025

    Evidence

    Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  11. 18-Feb-2025

    Evidence

    Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  12. 10-Dec-2024

    Evidence

    Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  13. 14-Oct-2024

    Evidence

    Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  14. 27-Aug-2024

    DepositionView PDF

  15. 27-Aug-2024

    Evidence

    Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  16. 19-Jun-2024

    DepositionView PDF

  17. 19-Jun-2024

    Evidence

    Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  18. 27-Feb-2024

    Evidence

    Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  19. 05-Dec-2023

    IssueView PDF

  20. 05-Dec-2023

    Evidence

    Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  21. 26-Sep-2023

    Issues

    Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  22. 21-Jul-2023

    Issues

    Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  23. 23-May-2023

    Issues

    Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  24. 20-Feb-2023

    Appearance Of Party

    Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  25. 17-Dec-2022

    OrdersView PDF

  26. 17-Dec-2022

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  27. 17-Dec-2022

    Case filed

    Registration No. 494/2022

casestatus.in Summary

Summary of Case 494/2022 Petitioner(s): Puttaswamy, Shivalingaiah, and Shanthappa Respondent(s): Girijamma, C M Chandregowda, Darmaraj, and Sudharani Order Status: The case was heard on 10-09-2025 with witness examination. The court recorded witness testimony regarding disputed property (Survey No. 1/1) in Danayaknahalli village and claims concerning property allocation, compensation, and inheritance rights among family members. The matter involves contested property distribution following a house and land submersion, with disputes over compensation amounts received by different family members and property ownership documentation. The proceedings were adjourned with the court directing further clarification on the legal standing and property entitlements of the petitioners. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case