RAJIYA vs SEETHU Advocate - H R CHANDRU — 230/2025

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 7RULE1. Disposed: Uncontested--DECREED on 11th June 2026.

Case disposed

O.S. - Original Suit

CNR: KAHS510009432025

Filing Number

230/2025

Filing Date

11-Jun-2025

Registration No

230/2025

Registration Date

11-Jun-2025

Court

CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, BELUR

Judge

1570-I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC

Decision Date

11-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--DECREED

Last updated 20-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section 7RULE1

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.RAJIYA

    Adv. RAMESH Y D

  2. 2.MARIA

    Adv. RAMESH Y D

  3. 3.RESHMA

    Adv. RAMESH Y D

  4. 4.ROSHAN M

    Adv. RAMESH Y D

  5. 5.AJITH M

    Adv. RAMESH Y D

  6. 6.SHARIF

    Adv. RAMESH Y D

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.SEETHU Advocate - H R CHANDRU

  2. 2.GIRIJA

    Adv. H R CHANDRU

  3. 3.BHAGYA

    Adv. H R CHANDRU

  4. 4.BHARATHI

    Adv. H R CHANDRU

  5. 5.KRISHNARAJ URS

    Adv. H R CHANDRU

  6. 6.PUTTACHAR

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 11-Jun-2026

    JudgmentView PDF

    The court decreed the plaintiffs' suit for permanent injunction, finding they are absolute owners and in peaceful possession of the property granted to their deceased father Monu under the Akrama Sakrama scheme. The defendants, who failed to file a written statement or present evidence, were permanently restrained from demolishing the compound wall or interfering with the plaintiffs' possession and enjoyment of the property. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 11-Jun-2026

    Disposed

    I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  4. 23-Apr-2026

    Judgement.

    I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  5. 18-Mar-2026

    Arguments.

    I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  6. 18-Feb-2026

    DepositionView PDF

  7. 18-Feb-2026

    Arguments.

    I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  8. 24-Jan-2026

    DepositionView PDF

  9. 24-Jan-2026

    Plaintiff Evidence

    I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  10. 26-Nov-2025

    Plaintiff Evidence

    I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  11. 11-Nov-2025

    Written Statement

    I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  12. 10-Oct-2025

    Written Statement

    I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  13. 02-Sep-2025

    Written Statement

    I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  14. 17-Jun-2025

    OrdersView PDF

  15. 17-Jun-2025

    Summons

    Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  16. 16-Jun-2025

    Orders

    Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  17. 11-Jun-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  18. 11-Jun-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 230/2025

casestatus.in Summary

The court decreed the plaintiffs' suit for permanent injunction, finding they are absolute owners and in peaceful possession of the property granted to their deceased father Monu under the Akrama Sakrama scheme. The defendants, who failed to file a written statement or present evidence, were permanently restrained from demolishing the compound wall or interfering with the plaintiffs' possession and enjoyment of the property. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case