Ramya vs Basavaraju — 108/2023
Case under Order 7 Rule 1 Cpc. Status: Summons. Next hearing: 14th July 2026.
O.S. - Original Suit
CNR: KAHS510003342023
Filing Number
108/2023
Filing Date
02-Mar-2023
Registration No
108/2023
Registration Date
02-Mar-2023
Court
CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, BELUR
Judge
349-Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC
Last updated 20-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Ramya
Adv. Manjula Kurlekar
-
2.Rakshitha
Adv. Manjula Kurlekar
Respondent(s)
-
1.Basavaraju
-
2.Ramesha
-
3.Lakshamamma
Case History
-
14-Jul-2026
Next hearingPending
-
21-Apr-2026
Summons
Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
18-Mar-2026
For Amendement
Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
09-Feb-2026
For Amendement
Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
16-Dec-2025
Notice
Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
03-Nov-2025
Restored
Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
03-Nov-2025
Callon
Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
03-Nov-2025
Notice
Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
08-Jan-2025
JudgmentView PDF
Case Summary: O.S. No. 108/2023 The Civil Judge of Belur dismissed the partition suit filed by two daughters (Ramya and Rakshitha, aged 20 and 18) seeking partition of ancestral joint family properties after their father's death in 2017. Although the court found the properties were indeed ancestral joint family properties, it held the suit was not maintainable because the plaintiffs failed to join a necessary party—their aunt (the daughter of the grandfather), who has equal succession rights under the Hindu Succession Act 1956. No costs awarded due to family relationship. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
08-Jan-2025
Disposed
Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
19-Dec-2024
Judgement.
Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
17-Dec-2024
Judgement.
Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
27-Nov-2024
Judgement.
Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
05-Nov-2024
Judgement.
Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
16-Oct-2024
Judgement.
Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
18-Sep-2024
Arguments
Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
24-Aug-2024
Arguments
Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
19-Aug-2024
Callon
Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
24-Jul-2024
Arguments
Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
10-Apr-2024
Evidence
Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
26-Mar-2024
DepositionView PDF
-
26-Mar-2024
Evidence
Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
07-Feb-2024
Evidence
Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
21-Nov-2023
Evidence
Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
28-Aug-2023
Evidence
Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
06-Jun-2023
Appearance Of Party
Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
02-Mar-2023
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
02-Mar-2023
Case filed
Registration No. 108/2023
Case Summary: O.S. No. 108/2023 The Civil Judge of Belur dismissed the partition suit filed by two daughters (Ramya and Rakshitha, aged 20 and 18) seeking partition of ancestral joint family properties after their father's death in 2017. Although the court found the properties were indeed ancestral joint family properties, it held the suit was not maintainable because the plaintiffs failed to join a necessary party—their aunt (the daughter of the grandfather), who has equal succession rights under the Hindu Succession Act 1956. No costs awarded due to family relationship. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts