Gangamma vs Tahasildar — 129/2026

Case under Registration of Births and Deaths Act Section 13(3). Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE on 18th March 2026.

Case disposed

Crl.Misc. - CRIMINAL MISC.CASES

CNR: KAHS510002362026

Filing Number

129/2026

Filing Date

29-Jan-2026

Registration No

129/2026

Registration Date

29-Jan-2026

Court

CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, BELUR

Judge

349-Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC

Decision Date

18-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE

Last updated 20-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Registration of Births and Deaths Act Section 13(3)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Gangamma

    Adv. MALLIKARJUANAPPA K G

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Tahasildar

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 18-Mar-2026

    Orders

    Case Summary: Gangamma v. Tahasildar (Crl.Misc.No.129/2026) The court allowed Gangamma's petition seeking registration of her father Ningegowda's death, which occurred on 26.06.1986 but was never registered. The Tahasildar had previously issued a non-availability certificate confirming the death was not in the register. The court found the petitioner's oral testimony and documentary evidence—including a genealogical tree certificate, newspaper publications, and a notarized Aadhaar card—sufficient to establish the death. The court ordered the respondent to register the death in the concerned death register and issue a death certificate upon collection of late fees. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 18-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  4. 12-Mar-2026

    Deposition

  5. 12-Mar-2026

    Orders.

    Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  6. 29-Jan-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 29-Jan-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 129/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Gangamma v. Tahasildar (Crl.Misc.No.129/2026) The court allowed Gangamma's petition seeking registration of her father Ningegowda's death, which occurred on 26.06.1986 but was never registered. The Tahasildar had previously issued a non-availability certificate confirming the death was not in the register. The court found the petitioner's oral testimony and documentary evidence—including a genealogical tree certificate, newspaper publications, and a notarized Aadhaar card—sufficient to establish the death. The court ordered the respondent to register the death in the concerned death register and issue a death certificate upon collection of late fees. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case