Channakeshavaiah vs Shivanna Advocate - C M Chandregowda — 3/2017
Case under Order 7 Rule 1 Rw Sec 26 Cpc Section k. Status: Evidence.. Next hearing: 07th July 2026.
O.S. - Original Suit
CNR: KAHS510000072017
Filing Number
3/2017
Filing Date
02-Jan-2017
Registration No
3/2017
Registration Date
02-Jan-2017
Court
CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, BELUR
Judge
349-Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC
Last updated 20-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Channakeshavaiah
Adv. B MANJUNATH
-
2.Ramachandraiah
Adv. B MANJUNATH
-
3.Shankarappa
Adv. B MANJUNATH
-
4.Nagaraju
Adv. B MANJUNATH
-
5.Ananda
Adv. B MANJUNATH
-
6.Lokesha
Adv. B MANJUNATH
-
7.Kalamma
Adv. B MANJUNATH
-
8.Parvathamma
Adv. B MANJUNATH
Respondent(s)
-
1.Shivanna Advocate - C M Chandregowda
-
2.The Thasildar
Adv. A G P
-
3.The Assistant Commissioner
Adv. A G P
-
4.Deputy Commissioner
Adv. A G P
-
5.The Chief Secretary
Adv. A G P
Case History
-
07-Jul-2026
Next hearingPending
-
10-Jun-2026
Evidence.
Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
18-Mar-2026
Evidence
Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
11-Feb-2026
DepositionView PDF
Case Summary: 3/2017 Court: Civil Judge and JMFC Court, Belgaum Petitioners: Channakeshavaiah, Ramachandraiah, and Shankarappa Respondents: Shivanna Advocate, C.M. Chandregowda, The Thasildar, and The Assistant Commissioner Outcome: On February 11, 2026, the court heard the main hearing with the petitioner's advocate B.M. Ravindra. The second petitioner's certified statement was submitted and verified as true. The court admitted multiple documentary exhibits (NIP-1 through NIP-17) relating to survey records from Bellur village, Madhihalli taluk, Belgaum, covering tax records from various assessment years (1974-75 through 2014-15), mutation records, and revenue department certifications. The case was adjourned to allow the petitioner's counsel to proceed with the main hearing after requesting additional time. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
11-Feb-2026
Evidence
Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
06-Jan-2026
Evidence
Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
25-Nov-2025
Evidence
Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
28-Oct-2025
Evidence
Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
19-Sep-2025
Evidence
Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
04-Aug-2025
A.D.R
Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
08-Jul-2025
Evidence.
Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
08-Apr-2025
Evidence
Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
25-Feb-2025
Evidence
Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
08-Jan-2025
Evidence
Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
20-Nov-2024
Evidence
Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
01-Oct-2024
Evidence
Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
13-Aug-2024
Evidence
Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
25-Jun-2024
Evidence
Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
20-Mar-2024
Evidence
Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
29-Jan-2024
DepositionView PDF
-
29-Jan-2024
Evidence
Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
06-Dec-2023
Evidence
Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
12-Oct-2023
Evidence
Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
11-Aug-2023
Evidence
Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
21-Jun-2023
Evidence
Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
28-Mar-2023
Evidence
Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
01-Feb-2023
Evidence
Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
12-Dec-2022
For Amendement
Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
07-Nov-2022
For Amendement
Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
10-Oct-2022
For Amendement
Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
12-Sep-2022
For Amendement
Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
02-Aug-2022
For Amendement
Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
06-Jul-2022
For Amendement
Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
24-May-2022
For Amendement
Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
05-Apr-2022
For Amendement
Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
14-Mar-2022
For Amendement
Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
16-Feb-2022
For Amendement
Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
17-Jan-2022
For Amendement
Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
15-Dec-2021
For Amendement
Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
02-Nov-2021
For Amendement
Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
22-Sep-2021
For Amendement
Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
16-Aug-2021
Evidence
Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
14-Jun-2021
Evidence
Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
16-Mar-2021
Evidence
Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
12-Jan-2021
Evidence
Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
11-Nov-2020
Evidence
Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
15-Sep-2020
Evidence
Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
29-Jul-2020
Evidence
Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
10-Jun-2020
Evidence
Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
16-Mar-2020
Evidence
Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
21-Jan-2020
Evidence
Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
06-Nov-2019
Evidence
Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
26-Aug-2019
Evidence
Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
19-Jun-2019
Evidence
Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
27-Mar-2019
Evidence
Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
12-Feb-2019
Evidence
Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
13-Dec-2018
Evidence
Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
29-Oct-2018
Evidence
Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
20-Aug-2018
Evidence
Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
20-Jun-2018
List Of Witness And Documents
Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
09-Apr-2018
Issues.
Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
05-Mar-2018
Hearing in IA
Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
16-Jan-2018
Additional W/S
Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
29-Nov-2017
For Amendement
Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
26-Oct-2017
For Amendement
Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
21-Sep-2017
Steps
Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
29-Aug-2017
Hearing in IA
Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
21-Jul-2017
Hearing in IA
Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
19-Jun-2017
Written Statement
Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
13-Apr-2017
Objection
Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
17-Mar-2017
Objection
Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
17-Feb-2017
Objection
Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
23-Jan-2017
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
02-Jan-2017
Case filed
Registration No. 3/2017
Case Summary: 3/2017 Court: Civil Judge and JMFC Court, Belgaum Petitioners: Channakeshavaiah, Ramachandraiah, and Shankarappa Respondents: Shivanna Advocate, C.M. Chandregowda, The Thasildar, and The Assistant Commissioner Outcome: On February 11, 2026, the court heard the main hearing with the petitioner's advocate B.M. Ravindra. The second petitioner's certified statement was submitted and verified as true. The court admitted multiple documentary exhibits (NIP-1 through NIP-17) relating to survey records from Bellur village, Madhihalli taluk, Belgaum, covering tax records from various assessment years (1974-75 through 2014-15), mutation records, and revenue department certifications. The case was adjourned to allow the petitioner's counsel to proceed with the main hearing after requesting additional time. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts